BenchHigh Court
Judgments and orders from the Chandigarh Bench bench of High Court.
The petitioners sought to quash a criminal complaint (No. 6614 dated 29.09.2015) filed by Can Bank Factors Limited under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and Section 420 of the IPC, along with the summoning order dated 31.05.2016. The complaint arose from the dishonour of cheques issued by M/s Supre
The writ petition addresses whether authorities under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA), retain jurisdiction over a corporate debtor's properties once liquidation is approved under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The petitioner, the Liquidator appointed by the National Company Law Trib
The case involves two bail applications (2722/2021 and 2746/2021) filed by Sidharth Chauhan seeking anticipatory bail in connection with FIR Nos. 97/2018 and 118/2018, registered under Sections 406/420/409/120B IPC at Police Station Economic Offences Wing, Mandir Marg, New Delhi. FIR 97/2018 pertains to the 'Estella' p
Ferro Alloys Corporation Ltd. (FACOR) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking to set aside an order dated 8th September, 2020, passed by the Directorate of Mines, which rejected FACOR's representation for waiving demands raised against it. These demands were related to mining dues.
The petition was filed seeking a direction to make the two Benches of the NCLT in Chennai fully operational and to consider establishing a third Bench due to the high volume of pending cases. It was submitted that the two Benches in Chennai were not fully operational due to the absence of member nominations. A technica
The case involves writ petitions filed by Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL) and Piramal Capital & Housing Finance Limited challenging an order by the CBI Court that partially allowed DHFL's application under Section 32A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The CBI Court rejected the prayer for di
The case involves two special civil applications (No. 16707 and 16755 of 2021) filed in the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad. The petitioners sought withdrawal of their writ petitions challenging an order dated 01.03.2021 passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The petitioners had previously approached th
The case involves a petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of declaration to declare Section 9 of the IBC, 2016 as unconstitutional and void, particularly concerning its application to disputes arising under the Electricity Act, 2003. The petitioner, Tamil Nadu Generation and Distr
The case involves Ultratech Nathdwara Cement Ltd., a subsidiary of UltraTech Cement Limited, challenging a demand notice issued by the State of Rajasthan. The company participated in the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Binani Cement Ltd., whose debts to the Bank of Baroda led to an application under S
The case involves a civil application in the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, concerning R/Special Civil Application No. 5042 of 2021, along with connected civil applications. The primary issue revolves around the pronouncement of a judgment by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) in CP (IB) No. 249 of 2018, whe
The case involves a writ petition filed by Sunil Tandon, an erstwhile independent Non-Executive Director of respondent no.3 company, challenging an order dated 08.07.2021 and a letter dated 16.07.2021 issued by respondent no.1. These actions included the filing of C.P. No. 295/MB/2021 before the NCLT, Mumbai Bench. The
This is a writ petition (L.) No.22872 of 2021 filed in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. Adisri Commercial Private Limited and another are the petitioners, and the Reserve Bank of India and others are the respondents. The court heard the senior counsel for both parties.
The writ petition was filed by Adisri Commercial Private Limited and another against the Reserve Bank of India and others, seeking to quash an order dated 01.10.2021 and a related press release dated 04.10.2021. The impugned order, passed under section 45IE of the Reserve Bank of India Act, 1934, superseded the Board o
The case involves two writ petitions (WPL No.21271 of 2021 and WPL No.21272 of 2021) challenging identical orders passed by the Debts Recovery Tribunal-1, Mumbai. The orders were issued in Application IBC No.2 of 2021 and Application IBC No.3 of 2021, respectively, both filed by Omkara Assets Reconstruction Private Lim
SKS Power Generation (Chhattisgarh) Ltd filed a Commercial Summary Suit against Canara Bank based on unconditional Bank Guarantees. Cethar Ltd, the principal debtor at whose instance the Bank Guarantees were issued, filed an Interim Application for impleadment. The bank guarantees were issued by Canara Bank at Cethar's
The writ petition was filed against an order dated March 26, 2021, passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai. The petitioner claims to be a financial creditor of the corporate debtor in the NCLT proceedings. A dispute exists between the petitioner and the first respondent, who is allegedly the mother-
The Civil Revision Petition was filed to strike off the proceedings in IBC SR No.2643 of 2020, which resulted in a consequential order dated 22.10.2020, pending on the file of the Debts Recovery Tribunal-II, Chennai. The petitioner, an admitted defaulter, sought to delay repayment by referring to irrelevant judgments a
The petition was filed due to the grievance that the petitioner was not supplied with a copy of the decision taken on his complaint, despite the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (Grievance and Complaint Handling Procedure) Regulations, 2017 mandating immediate supply of the decision copy.
The case involves a petition filed by Lalit Kishore Aggarwal and another, who are personal guarantors of M/s Globalite Retail Pvt. Ltd. They sought to quash a statutory demand notice dated 26.03.2021 issued under FORM B of Rule 7(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code for the insolvency resolution process of personal
Dicksons Overseas Private Limited filed a writ petition in the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, seeking relief related to land conversion. The petitioners sought the court's intervention to expedite the processing of their application for converting Class II land into Class I land under Section 29 of t
