M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited (appellant/plaintiff) filed a commercial appeal against a judgment dated 16.12.2025 by the Principal District Judge-cum-Commercial Court, Muzaffarpur. The original suit (Commercial Case No.01 of 2019) was filed by the appellant seeking specific performance of contract, re
The appellant, M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited, filed a commercial appeal against a judgment of the Principal District Judge-cum-Commercial Court, Muzaffarpur. The original suit involved the appellant as a sub-contractor seeking reliefs against M/s Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Limited (defendant no.1) and
This consolidated judgment addresses multiple writ petitions filed by various secured creditors challenging orders from the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and seeking clarification on the retroactive application of Section 96(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). This amendment, effective from May 26, 20
Nav Munjal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Society) filed a Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to challenge an arbitral award dated May 25, 2017. The award granted specific performance of a Development Agreement and compensation to Ms. Saranga Anil Agarwal (Developer), the propr
Two writ petitions were filed challenging an order dated 18th December 2024 by the Disciplinary Committee of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which suspended Jitender Kumar Jain, an insolvency professional and liquidator, for three months. The suspension stemmed from complaints by the promoters/ex-d
The Plaintiff, Central Court Hotel, leased premises to Defendant No.2 (a company) for a restaurant. Defendant No.1, Jasmeet Singh Marwah, was the Managing Director and a major shareholder of Defendant No.2. Defendant No.2 defaulted on rent payments, leading the Plaintiff to initiate arbitration proceedings. A settlemen
Defendant No.2 filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking rejection of the plaint. The defendant argued that the suit was not maintainable against them due to an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), as they are a personal
Four writ petitions were filed challenging Regulation 31A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, which introduced a 'regulatory fee' of 0.25% of the realisable value to creditors under an approved resolution plan (if more than liquidation value), effective 01.10.2022. The p
Multiple applications and writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, raising a common question regarding the applicability of the interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) to criminal proceedings initiated under Section 138 read with Section 141
Bank of Baroda (Appellant) filed an intra-court appeal against a Single Judge's judgment dated 10.02.2026, which quashed Look Out Circulars (LOCs) issued against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Vineet Gupta & Ors.). These respondents were promoters/directors of M/s Parabolic Drugs Limited, a borrower company whose loan accoun
Tata Capital Financial Services Limited (Petitioner) extended financial assistance to Neel Motors LLP (Respondent No. 1), with Respondent Nos. 2-5 acting as guarantors. The Petitioner initiated a Section 9 Arbitration Petition in 2021 and also a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Respondent No. 1, w
Tecpro Systems Limited (in Liquidation) filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator against Reliance Infrastructure Limited. The dispute arose from a Purchase Order dated January 17, 2018, which contained an arbitration clause. The Liquid
The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging an ITAT order dated 12 May 2023. This ITAT order had dismissed the Revenue's appeal against a CIT(A) order dated 31 August 2018, which had partly allowed the assessee's appeal against an assessment order dated 13 March 2015 for Asse
The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They sought various reliefs including quashing multiple complaint cases under the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013, quashing an FIR for offences under IPC, Prize Chits and Mone
The writ petition challenges an order by the Chairperson, IBBI, cancelling the petitioner's registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP). The cancellation stemmed from observations made by the NCLAT regarding the petitioner's conduct as an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for INCAB Industries Limited. Allegatio
The petitioner, an auction purchaser, acquired property of a corporate debtor (M/s. Gonglu Agro Pvt. Ltd.) through an e-auction conducted by a liquidator under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). A sale certificate was issued to the petitioner. Respondent No.1, the Joint District Registrar, subsequently ordered t
The controversy arose from the Official Assignee's insistence that claims in insolvency proceedings must be based on a decree or order from a competent court. This stance was challenged by the counsel for the insolvents, leading the High Court to frame a specific legal question for adjudication regarding the necessity
The petitioner, Monoranjan Roy, filed a writ petition challenging a Show Cause Notice (SCN) issued by Union Bank of India on 13th October, 2025. The SCN directed the petitioner to show cause why his account should not be categorized as fraud, based on a Forensic Audit report dated 26th May, 2025. The petitioner, a dire
Tata Coffee Limited filed a complaint against its former employee, Ramla, under Section 452 of the Companies Act, 2013, for wrongfully withholding residential accommodation. The Chief Judicial Magistrate (CJM) returned the complaint, erroneously holding that criminal courts lack jurisdiction and that Section 452 was de
The petitioners, including Eraaya Lifespaces Limited and its directors, company secretary, and CFO, sought to quash an investigational proceeding (GR Case No. 3134 of 2025) initiated by opposite party No.2 (a shareholder). The complaint alleged forgery, criminal conspiracy, and fraudulent activities. Specifically, it w
