CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified

BenchHigh Court

Kohima

Gauhati High Court permanent bench at Kohima.

15 cases · showing 1 to 15

Pravin R Navandar vs. State of Maharashtra through Ministry of Home Affairs Govt. of Maharashtra

Pravin R Navandar, the erstwhile resolution professional and now a member of the monitoring committee, filed a Writ Petition (L) No. 13580 of 2026 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petition was necessitated by the obstructionist attitude of the suspended Directors of an unnamed Corporate Debtor, which

High Court28 April 2026TCN-2026-HC-00016

Mihir Bagade vs. Pankaj Bagade

This is a criminal revision application challenging the order of grant of maintenance passed by the Family Court No.1, Nagpur, dated 25.04.2023. The applicant, a minor child, claims maintenance through his mother from his father. The application seeks modification of the maintenance amount from Rs.15,000/- to Rs.50,000

High Court8 April 2026TCN-2026-HC-00015

PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs. M/S GLOBE CAPITAL MARKET LTD.

The appeal challenges an order by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which rejected the Income Tax Department's appeal against an order that had rejected the department's assessment related to a buyback of shares.

High Court7 April 2026TCN-2026-HC-00014

N. H. Gowda vs. Mr. Rangarama

The case involves appeals related to orders passed by the Commercial Court concerning a partnership firm involved in a wedding destination business. Disputes arose between the partners, leading to the issuance of dissolution notices and separate applications under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

High Court9 April 2025TCN-2025-HC-00072

In the matter of Compuage Infocom Limited Vs. N/A

Compuage Infocom Limited (“CIL”), an Indian-incorporated company, faced financial difficulties due to a recession in the IT sector and stiff competition. To meet its working capital requirements, CIL entered into a loan agreement with another Indian company on 2 August 2021 but defaulted on repayments. Consequently, th

High Court24 March 2025TCN-2025-HC-00060

In the matter of Union of India vs. OCL Iron and Steel Limited & Ors.

The present appeal was filed by the Union of India, challenging a judgment dated July 26, 2024, passed by a Single Judge of the Delhi High Court. The Single Judge had allowed a writ petition filed by OCL Iron and Steel Limited, the respondent, which had challenged the appellant's decision to debar it from participating

High Court22 October 2024TCN-2024-HC-00017

In the matter of Smbc Aviation Capital Limited Vs Union Of India

This case involves an application seeking an extension of time for compliance with previous orders of the High Court. The application, CM APPL. 30395/2024, was filed in the context of a larger set of writ petitions, including W.P.(C) 7369/2023. The core issue revolves around the timely handover of records and documents

High Court31 May 2024TCN-2024-HC-00081

In the matter of Shantanu Prakash Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.

The petitioner, an ex-director and guarantor of M/s Educomp Solution Limited (the Company), filed a petition seeking to quash Show Cause Notices (SCNs) issued by various respondent banks. These SCNs proposed to declare the Company's account as 'Fraud'. The Company had availed credit facilities from a consortium of bank

High Court22 May 2024TCN-2024-HC-00088

In the matter of Rajan Garg vs. Chief Executive Officer & Ors.

The petitioner, Rajan Garg, acting as the Resolution Professional (RP) for Truly Creative Developers Pvt Ltd, filed a writ petition seeking to stay an acquisition process initiated under the Slum Rehabilitation Act, 1995. Truly Creative, a corporate developer, had failed to implement a slum redevelopment scheme despite

High Court3 April 2024TCN-2024-HC-00109

In the matter of Angre Port Private Ltd. Vs. TAG 15 (IMO. 9705550) & Anr. Admiralty and Vice Admiralty Jurisdiction Interim Application(L) No. 112 of 2021 In Commercial Admiralty Suit(L) No. 4 of 2020

Angre Port Private Ltd filed a Commercial Admiralty Suit against TAG 15 (IMO. 9705550) & Anr., seeking a judgment and decree for Rs. 9,37,19,098/- along with interest. The suit arises from unpaid port charges, berth hire charges, penal berth hire charges, salvage charges, GST, and interest incurred while the vessel was

High Court3 January 2022TCN-2022-HC-00067

In the matter of Nag Leathers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Muzain Hides Crl. O.P. Nos.17954, 17976, 24110, 25561 & 25573 of 2018 and Crl.M.P.Nos.9357, 9358, 9381, 9382, 13607, 13610, 14587, 14589,14607 & 14608 of 2018

The Criminal Original Petitions were filed to quash criminal proceedings in S.T.C.Nos. 200, 344, 219, 551 and 496 of 2018 pending before the Judicial Magistrate / Fast Track Courts in Erode. The petitioners are accused of offences under Sections 138, 141, and 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant

High Court3 January 2022TCN-2022-HC-00068

In the matter of Adarsh Jhunjhunjwala vs. State Bank of India & Anr. WPO 1548 of 2021

The writ petition seeks intervention against an order dated 18th October 2021, passed by the Reviewing Authority regarding Wilful Defaulter proceedings initiated by the State Bank of India. The bank had communicated the order to RBI, CIBIL, and other sites. The petitioner, Adarsh Jhunjhunwala, is contesting the proceed

High Court24 December 2021TCN-2021-HC-00001

In the matter of Murli Industries Limited Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. W.P. No. 2948 of 2021

Murli Industries Limited filed writ petitions challenging notices issued by the Income Tax Department under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, seeking to reopen the concluded assessment for the assessment year 2014-15. The petitioner argued that these notices were issued after the approval of a Resolution Plan un

High Court23 December 2021TCN-2021-HC-00002

In the matter of Vishnoo Mittal Vs. Shakti Trading Company CRM-M No. 10624 of 2020 (O&M)

The case involves a complaint bearing No. 15580/18 titled as Ms/ Shakti Trading Company versus M/s Xalta Food and Beverages Pvt. Ltd., and others, under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. A cheque for Rs. One lac was dishonoured. The complainant sent a statutory notice. The petitioner, Vishnu Mittal,

High Court21 December 2021TCN-2021-HC-00003

In the matter of M/s CFM Asset Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd Vs. Unison Hotels Private Ltd and Ors., IA No. 1 of 2021 in WP No. 22667 of 2021

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Section 151 of CPC seeking to suspend an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal, Special Bench, Court-1, Hyderabad, in IA No.281/2019 in CP (IB) No.219/7/HDB/2017 dated September 1, 2021. The High Court is considering whether to grant an interim suspension of this N

High Court16 September 2021TCN-2021-HC-00017