Bombay High Court

Moser Baer India Limited, currently undergoing liquidation, faced a substantial demand for Goods and Services Tax (GST) and penalty. The company filed a statutory appeal under Section 107 of the CGST Act, but the respondent authorities refused to entertain it without a mandatory pre-deposit as per Section 107(6) of the

A Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (CMA) was filed under Section 75(2) of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, challenging an order dated 18.12.2025 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, in I.P. No. 4 of 2016. In the original insolvency petition, respondents 1 to 9 (petitioning-creditors) sought

Jahir Ussain (appellant) challenged an order dated 18.12.2025 by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, in I.P. No. 4 of 2016. In the original I.P. petition, respondents 1 to 9 (creditors) sought to declare Jahir Ussain and respondents 10 to 14 as insolvent persons. The lower court allowed the petiti

M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited (appellant/plaintiff) filed a commercial appeal against a judgment dated 16.12.2025 by the Principal District Judge-cum-Commercial Court, Muzaffarpur. The original suit (Commercial Case No.01 of 2019) was filed by the appellant seeking specific performance of contract, re

The appellant, M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited, filed a commercial appeal against a judgment of the Principal District Judge-cum-Commercial Court, Muzaffarpur. The original suit involved the appellant as a sub-contractor seeking reliefs against M/s Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Limited (defendant no.1) and

P.D. Vincent, acting as the Resolution Professional (RP) for Kerala Housing Finance Limited (KHFL), filed a criminal writ petition seeking a stay on all pending coercive proceedings against him in his capacity as RP. These proceedings, listed under Exhibit P-4, are before various District Courts, including the 3rd Addi

This consolidated judgment addresses multiple writ petitions filed by various secured creditors challenging orders from the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and seeking clarification on the retroactive application of Section 96(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). This amendment, effective from May 26, 20

Nav Munjal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Society) filed a Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to challenge an arbitral award dated May 25, 2017. The award granted specific performance of a Development Agreement and compensation to Ms. Saranga Anil Agarwal (Developer), the propr

Two writ petitions were filed challenging an order dated 18th December 2024 by the Disciplinary Committee of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which suspended Jitender Kumar Jain, an insolvency professional and liquidator, for three months. The suspension stemmed from complaints by the promoters/ex-d

The Plaintiff, Central Court Hotel, leased premises to Defendant No.2 (a company) for a restaurant. Defendant No.1, Jasmeet Singh Marwah, was the Managing Director and a major shareholder of Defendant No.2. Defendant No.2 defaulted on rent payments, leading the Plaintiff to initiate arbitration proceedings. A settlemen

Defendant No.2 filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking rejection of the plaint. The defendant argued that the suit was not maintainable against them due to an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), as they are a personal

Four writ petitions were filed challenging Regulation 31A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, which introduced a 'regulatory fee' of 0.25% of the realisable value to creditors under an approved resolution plan (if more than liquidation value), effective 01.10.2022. The p

Multiple applications and writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, raising a common question regarding the applicability of the interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) to criminal proceedings initiated under Section 138 read with Section 141

Bank of Baroda (Appellant) filed an intra-court appeal against a Single Judge's judgment dated 10.02.2026, which quashed Look Out Circulars (LOCs) issued against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Vineet Gupta & Ors.). These respondents were promoters/directors of M/s Parabolic Drugs Limited, a borrower company whose loan accoun

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited (Petitioner) extended financial assistance to Neel Motors LLP (Respondent No. 1), with Respondent Nos. 2-5 acting as guarantors. The Petitioner initiated a Section 9 Arbitration Petition in 2021 and also a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Respondent No. 1, w

Tecpro Systems Limited (in Liquidation) filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator against Reliance Infrastructure Limited. The dispute arose from a Purchase Order dated January 17, 2018, which contained an arbitration clause. The Liquid

The petitioners sought to quash a criminal complaint (No. 6614 dated 29.09.2015) filed by Can Bank Factors Limited under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and Section 420 of the IPC, along with the summoning order dated 31.05.2016. The complaint arose from the dishonour of cheques issued by M/s Supre

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging an ITAT order dated 12 May 2023. This ITAT order had dismissed the Revenue's appeal against a CIT(A) order dated 31 August 2018, which had partly allowed the assessee's appeal against an assessment order dated 13 March 2015 for Asse

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They sought various reliefs including quashing multiple complaint cases under the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013, quashing an FIR for offences under IPC, Prize Chits and Mone

The writ petition challenges an order by the Chairperson, IBBI, cancelling the petitioner's registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP). The cancellation stemmed from observations made by the NCLAT regarding the petitioner's conduct as an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for INCAB Industries Limited. Allegatio