CaseEase - Legal Intelligence Simplified

CourtHigh Court

High Courts

High Courts of India, including principal seats and benches.

562 cases · showing 1 to 20

Jahir Ussain vs. U.A.Rahman Batcha & Ors.

A Civil Miscellaneous Appeal (CMA) was filed under Section 75(2) of the Provincial Insolvency Act, 1920, challenging an order dated 18.12.2025 passed by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, in I.P. No. 4 of 2016. In the original insolvency petition, respondents 1 to 9 (petitioning-creditors) sought

High Court30 September 2026TCN-2026-HC-00055

Jahir Ussain vs. U.A.Rahman Batcha & Ors.

Jahir Ussain (appellant) challenged an order dated 18.12.2025 by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Thanjavur, in I.P. No. 4 of 2016. In the original I.P. petition, respondents 1 to 9 (creditors) sought to declare Jahir Ussain and respondents 10 to 14 as insolvent persons. The lower court allowed the petiti

High Court30 September 2026TCN-2026-HC-00053

M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited vs. M/S Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Limited & Ors.

M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited (appellant/plaintiff) filed a commercial appeal against a judgment dated 16.12.2025 by the Principal District Judge-cum-Commercial Court, Muzaffarpur. The original suit (Commercial Case No.01 of 2019) was filed by the appellant seeking specific performance of contract, re

High Court29 September 2026TCN-2026-HC-00056

M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited vs. M/S Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Limited & Ors.

The appellant, M/s Aneja Constructions (India) Private Limited, filed a commercial appeal against a judgment of the Principal District Judge-cum-Commercial Court, Muzaffarpur. The original suit involved the appellant as a sub-contractor seeking reliefs against M/s Kanti Bijlee Utpadan Nigam Limited (defendant no.1) and

High Court29 September 2026TCN-2026-HC-00054

P.D. Vincent, Resolution Professional of Kerala Housing Finance Limited vs. State of Kerala & Ors.

P.D. Vincent, acting as the Resolution Professional (RP) for Kerala Housing Finance Limited (KHFL), filed a criminal writ petition seeking a stay on all pending coercive proceedings against him in his capacity as RP. These proceedings, listed under Exhibit P-4, are before various District Courts, including the 3rd Addi

High Court22 September 2026TCN-2026-HC-00057

Indian Bank and Others vs. Shabbir Abbas Patel and Others

This consolidated judgment addresses multiple writ petitions filed by various secured creditors challenging orders from the Debts Recovery Tribunal (DRT) and seeking clarification on the retroactive application of Section 96(4) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). This amendment, effective from May 26, 20

High Court18 September 2026TCN-2026-HC-00052

Nav Munjal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. vs. Saranga Anil Agarwal

Nav Munjal Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. (Society) filed a Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to challenge an arbitral award dated May 25, 2017. The award granted specific performance of a Development Agreement and compensation to Ms. Saranga Anil Agarwal (Developer), the propr

High Court25 August 2026TCN-2026-HC-00048

Jitender Kumar Jain & Anr. vs. Union of India & Anr.

Two writ petitions were filed challenging an order dated 18th December 2024 by the Disciplinary Committee of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI), which suspended Jitender Kumar Jain, an insolvency professional and liquidator, for three months. The suspension stemmed from complaints by the promoters/ex-d

High Court25 August 2026TCN-2026-HC-00047

CENTRAL COURT HOTEL vs. JASMEET SINGH MARWAH & ANR.

The Plaintiff, Central Court Hotel, leased premises to Defendant No.2 (a company) for a restaurant. Defendant No.1, Jasmeet Singh Marwah, was the Managing Director and a major shareholder of Defendant No.2. Defendant No.2 defaulted on rent payments, leading the Plaintiff to initiate arbitration proceedings. A settlemen

High Court24 August 2026TCN-2026-HC-00051

IDBI Trusteeship Services Limited vs. Manish Jain & Ors.

Defendant No.2 filed an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking rejection of the plaint. The defendant argued that the suit was not maintainable against them due to an interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), as they are a personal

High Court19 August 2026TCN-2026-HC-00049

Hazel Mercantile Limited & others, Vineet Shrivastava, Yadubir Singh Sajwan, Suraksha Realty Limited & another vs. Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India & ors., Union of India

Four writ petitions were filed challenging Regulation 31A of the IBBI (Insolvency Resolution Process for Corporate Persons) Regulations, 2016, which introduced a 'regulatory fee' of 0.25% of the realisable value to creditors under an approved resolution plan (if more than liquidation value), effective 01.10.2022. The p

High Court19 August 2026TCN-2026-HC-00045

Jagmohan Garg & Ors. vs. National Spot Exchange Ltd & Ors.

Multiple applications and writ petitions were filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, raising a common question regarding the applicability of the interim moratorium under Section 96 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) to criminal proceedings initiated under Section 138 read with Section 141

High Court18 August 2026TCN-2026-HC-00050

BANK OF BARODA vs. VINEET GUPTA & ORS.

Bank of Baroda (Appellant) filed an intra-court appeal against a Single Judge's judgment dated 10.02.2026, which quashed Look Out Circulars (LOCs) issued against Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 (Vineet Gupta & Ors.). These respondents were promoters/directors of M/s Parabolic Drugs Limited, a borrower company whose loan accoun

High Court28 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00046

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited vs. Neel Motors LLP & Ors.

Tata Capital Financial Services Limited (Petitioner) extended financial assistance to Neel Motors LLP (Respondent No. 1), with Respondent Nos. 2-5 acting as guarantors. The Petitioner initiated a Section 9 Arbitration Petition in 2021 and also a Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Respondent No. 1, w

High Court24 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00041

Tecpro Systems Limited (In Liquidation) vs. Reliance Infrastructure Limited

Tecpro Systems Limited (in Liquidation) filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking the appointment of an Arbitrator against Reliance Infrastructure Limited. The dispute arose from a Purchase Order dated January 17, 2018, which contained an arbitration clause. The Liquid

High Court22 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00023

Ajay Gupta and another vs. Can Bank Factors Limited

The petitioners sought to quash a criminal complaint (No. 6614 dated 29.09.2015) filed by Can Bank Factors Limited under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and Section 420 of the IPC, along with the summoning order dated 31.05.2016. The complaint arose from the dishonour of cheques issued by M/s Supre

High Court20 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00024

Pr Commissioner Of Income Tax Central 4 vs. DBM Geotechnics And Construction Pvt Ltd

The Revenue filed an appeal under Section 260A of the Income-tax Act, 1961, challenging an ITAT order dated 12 May 2023. This ITAT order had dismissed the Revenue's appeal against a CIT(A) order dated 31 August 2018, which had partly allowed the assessee's appeal against an assessment order dated 13 March 2015 for Asse

High Court17 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00043

Rekha Neware & Ors. vs. State of Chhattisgarh & Ors.

The petitioners filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. They sought various reliefs including quashing multiple complaint cases under the Companies Act, 1956 and 2013, quashing an FIR for offences under IPC, Prize Chits and Mone

High Court16 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00044

Sashi Agarwal vs. Union of India & Ors.

The writ petition challenges an order by the Chairperson, IBBI, cancelling the petitioner's registration as an Insolvency Professional (IP). The cancellation stemmed from observations made by the NCLAT regarding the petitioner's conduct as an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) for INCAB Industries Limited. Allegatio

High Court16 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00022

Rajaram Food Products India Limited vs. The Joint District Registrar (Class-1) and Collector of Stamps, Nashik and others

The petitioner, an auction purchaser, acquired property of a corporate debtor (M/s. Gonglu Agro Pvt. Ltd.) through an e-auction conducted by a liquidator under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). A sale certificate was issued to the petitioner. Respondent No.1, the Joint District Registrar, subsequently ordered t

High Court14 July 2026TCN-2026-HC-00028