The case pertains to a company petition filed under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016. The matter was transferred from the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, relating to provisions of Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The case was listed on multiple dates (2017-04-25 and 2017-06-28), but no one attended. The registry intimated the next date of hearing to the parties.
Mr. Mukesh Dhirajlal Shah, representing Swastik Synergy Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a company petition against M/s. ABC Valves Private Limited. The case was initially with the Bombay High Court and was transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under the provisions of Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The matter was listed on 2017-04-25 and 2017-06-28, but no one attended the hearings. The registry informed the parties about the next hearing date. The petitioner, despite multiple opportunities, did not appear or pursue the petition. The court noted the procedure for intimation, which includes uploading the cause list on the NCLT website and displaying directions given on hearing in the official site. A notification dated 2017-06-29 allowed
…Sign in to view the parties.
Reference to provisions…
The matter was listed…
The case pertains to a company petition filed under the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code 2016. The matter was transferred from the Hon'ble High Court of Bombay, relating to provisions of Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The case was listed on multiple dates (2017-04-25 and 2017-06-28), but no one attended. The registry intimated the next date of hearing to the parties.
Mr. Mukesh Dhirajlal Shah, representing Swastik Synergy Engineering Pvt. Ltd., filed a company petition against M/s. ABC Valves Private Limited. The case was initially with the Bombay High Court and was transferred to the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under the provisions of Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956. The matter was listed on 2017-04-25 and 2017-06-28, but no one attended the hearings. The registry informed the parties about the next hearing date. The petitioner, despite multiple opportunities, did not appear or pursue the petition. The court noted the procedure for intimation, which includes uploading the cause list on the NCLT website and displaying directions given on hearing in the official site. A notification dated 2017-06-29 allowed
…Reference to provisions…
The matter was listed…