The case originates from a judgment and order dated 2023-11-09 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in CAAT(I) No. 241/2023. The appellant, Vish Wind Infrastrukture LLP, filed a civil appeal against the respondent, Shailen Shah, Resolution Professional of Wind World (India) Ltd. The appeal was filed with a delay, and an application for condonation of delay was also submitted.
Vish Wind Infrastrukture LLP filed a civil appeal against Shailen Shah, the Resolution Professional of Wind World (India) Ltd. The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 2023-11-09 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in CAAT(I) No. 241/2023. There was a delay in filing the appeal, and an application for condonation of delay was filed along with the appeal. The Supreme Court heard the arguments presented by the appellant's counsel and ultimately dismissed the appeal, concurring with the view taken by the NCLAT. The relevance of the facts lies in the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the NCLAT's judgment, indicating its agreement with the lower tribunal's assessment of the case.
Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The Supreme Court heard the appeal and…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case originates from a judgment and order dated 2023-11-09 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in CAAT(I) No. 241/2023. The appellant, Vish Wind Infrastrukture LLP, filed a civil appeal against the respondent, Shailen Shah, Resolution Professional of Wind World (India) Ltd. The appeal was filed with a delay, and an application for condonation of delay was also submitted.
Vish Wind Infrastrukture LLP filed a civil appeal against Shailen Shah, the Resolution Professional of Wind World (India) Ltd. The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 2023-11-09 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in CAAT(I) No. 241/2023. There was a delay in filing the appeal, and an application for condonation of delay was filed along with the appeal. The Supreme Court heard the arguments presented by the appellant's counsel and ultimately dismissed the appeal, concurring with the view taken by the NCLAT. The relevance of the facts lies in the Supreme Court's decision to uphold the NCLAT's judgment, indicating its agreement with the lower tribunal's assessment of the case.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The Supreme Court heard the appeal and…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.