The case involves a challenge to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) decision regarding the ownership rights of trademarks of the Corporate Debtor, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL). The Resolution Plan submitted by SREI Multiple Asset Investment Trust Vision India Fund was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 81.39% voting share and conditionally approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). A dispute arose regarding the ownership of the trademarks "Deccan Chronicle" and "Andhra Bhoomi". The NCLT declared that the Corporate Debtor had the exclusive right to use these trademarks, a decision challenged by the respondents. The NCLAT overturned the NCLT's decision, stating it amounted to a modification of the

The case involves a challenge to the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal's (NCLAT) decision regarding the ownership rights of trademarks of the Corporate Debtor, Deccan Chronicle Holdings Ltd. (DCHL). The Resolution Plan submitted by SREI Multiple Asset Investment Trust Vision India Fund was approved by the Committee of Creditors (CoC) with 81.39% voting share and conditionally approved by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). A dispute arose regarding the ownership of the trademarks "Deccan Chronicle" and "Andhra Bhoomi". The NCLT declared that the Corporate Debtor had the exclusive right to use these trademarks, a decision challenged by the respondents. The NCLAT overturned the NCLT's decision, stating it amounted to a modification of the