The case involves civil appeals against a judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT had held that an appeal filed by the Central Government was not maintainable. The High Court of Delhi was initially approached in writ petitions before the alternative remedy of appeal to NCLAT was availed. The impugned judgment had set aside a notification, which the Supreme Court upheld. The NCLAT dismissed the appeals following the main judgment.
M/S Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. filed civil appeals against the Union of India & Ors. before the Supreme Court of India. The appeals challenged a judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT had ruled that an appeal filed by the Central Government was not maintainable, citing a notification dated 24.05.2017. Prior to approaching NCLAT, the appellants had filed writ petitions in the High Court of Delhi. The High Court directed the parties to avail the alternative remedy of appeal before NCLAT. The Supreme Court upheld the NCLAT's finding that the appeal was not maintainable but disagreed with the NCLAT's assessment of the case's merits and limitation aspects. The Supreme Court then revived the original writ petitions before the High
…Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the notification…
High Court of Delhi…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves civil appeals against a judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT had held that an appeal filed by the Central Government was not maintainable. The High Court of Delhi was initially approached in writ petitions before the alternative remedy of appeal to NCLAT was availed. The impugned judgment had set aside a notification, which the Supreme Court upheld. The NCLAT dismissed the appeals following the main judgment.
M/S Spartek Ceramics India Ltd. filed civil appeals against the Union of India & Ors. before the Supreme Court of India. The appeals challenged a judgment by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT had ruled that an appeal filed by the Central Government was not maintainable, citing a notification dated 24.05.2017. Prior to approaching NCLAT, the appellants had filed writ petitions in the High Court of Delhi. The High Court directed the parties to avail the alternative remedy of appeal before NCLAT. The Supreme Court upheld the NCLAT's finding that the appeal was not maintainable but disagreed with the NCLAT's assessment of the case's merits and limitation aspects. The Supreme Court then revived the original writ petitions before the High
…Date of the notification…
High Court of Delhi…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.