The petitioners, accused in FIR No. 396 of 2025, sought to quash the FIR before the High Court, which was declined. They contended mala fide intent in registering the FIR, which the High Court rejected. The High Court directed them to appear before the Trial Court within 60 days to apply for bail. The dispute involves allegations of cheating related to a refund, with the 3rd respondent representing a corporate entity now before NCLT, where an IRP has been appointed. Multiple FIRs and related proceedings were initiated on similar facts, some of which have been stayed or withdrawn.
Petitioners are accused in FIR No. 396 of 2025, dated 09.06.2025, registered at Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.
Petitioners sought to quash the FIR before the High Court, which was declined by the impugned judgment.
The High Court rejected the petitioners' contention of mala fide intention to cause purposeful harassment in registering the FIR.
The High Court directed petitioners to appear before the Trial Court within 60 days and granted liberty to apply for regular/anticipatory bail.
Shri Ashish Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioners, argued that the dispute is civil in nature and there is no cause for a criminal complaint.
Petitioners' counsel also argued that there are three different cases filed before various courts on the very same set of facts.
…Sign in to view the parties.
Nikhil Garg filed…
Ld. JMFC-04, Karkardooma, directed…
The petitioners, accused in FIR No. 396 of 2025, sought to quash the FIR before the High Court, which was declined. They contended mala fide intent in registering the FIR, which the High Court rejected. The High Court directed them to appear before the Trial Court within 60 days to apply for bail. The dispute involves allegations of cheating related to a refund, with the 3rd respondent representing a corporate entity now before NCLT, where an IRP has been appointed. Multiple FIRs and related proceedings were initiated on similar facts, some of which have been stayed or withdrawn.
Petitioners are accused in FIR No. 396 of 2025, dated 09.06.2025, registered at Police Station Tajganj, District Agra.
Petitioners sought to quash the FIR before the High Court, which was declined by the impugned judgment.
The High Court rejected the petitioners' contention of mala fide intention to cause purposeful harassment in registering the FIR.
The High Court directed petitioners to appear before the Trial Court within 60 days and granted liberty to apply for regular/anticipatory bail.
Shri Ashish Pandey, learned Counsel for the petitioners, argued that the dispute is civil in nature and there is no cause for a criminal complaint.
Petitioners' counsel also argued that there are three different cases filed before various courts on the very same set of facts.
…Nikhil Garg filed…
Ld. JMFC-04, Karkardooma, directed…