The appellant was convicted by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to imprisonment and compensation. An appeal was filed before the Sessions Court. During the appeal's pendency, the National Company Law Tribunal admitted a petition against the company, where the appellant was a director, and ordered its liquidation. The Sessions Court confirmed the Magistrate's order. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal permitted proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act to continue despite the moratorium. The appellant then questioned the appellate judgment in a revisional application before the High Court. The High Court directed suspension of sentence pending the
…Shashankbhai Jayantibhai Shah, the appellant, was convicted by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, NIA Court No.30, Ahmedabad, for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs.2,50,00,000 as compensation. He appealed to the Sessions Court at Ahmedabad. During the pendency of the appeal, a petition was admitted by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad, against the company where the appellant was a director. The National Company Law Tribunal ordered the liquidation of the company on March 19, 2018. The Sessions Court confirmed the Magistrate's order on July 26, 2018. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal permitted proceedings under Section 138 of
…Sign in to view the parties.
The appellant was convicted by the Additional…
The National Company…
The appellant was convicted by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and sentenced to imprisonment and compensation. An appeal was filed before the Sessions Court. During the appeal's pendency, the National Company Law Tribunal admitted a petition against the company, where the appellant was a director, and ordered its liquidation. The Sessions Court confirmed the Magistrate's order. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal permitted proceedings under Section 138 of the N.I. Act to continue despite the moratorium. The appellant then questioned the appellate judgment in a revisional application before the High Court. The High Court directed suspension of sentence pending the
…Shashankbhai Jayantibhai Shah, the appellant, was convicted by the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, NIA Court No.30, Ahmedabad, for dishonoring a cheque under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and was sentenced to two years imprisonment and ordered to pay Rs.2,50,00,000 as compensation. He appealed to the Sessions Court at Ahmedabad. During the pendency of the appeal, a petition was admitted by the National Company Law Tribunal, Ahmedabad, against the company where the appellant was a director. The National Company Law Tribunal ordered the liquidation of the company on March 19, 2018. The Sessions Court confirmed the Magistrate's order on July 26, 2018. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal permitted proceedings under Section 138 of
…The appellant was convicted by the Additional…
The National Company…