The case involves a Civil Appeal (No. 774 of 2024) brought before the Supreme Court of India. The appeal challenges an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1281 of 2023. The appellant sought interference with the NCLAT's order.
Sanil Prakash Sahu filed a Civil Appeal (No. 774 of 2024) before the Supreme Court of India, challenging an order issued by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1281 of 2023. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Another were the respondents in the appeal. The Supreme Court, after reviewing the case, found no reason to interfere with the NCLAT's order and dismissed the Civil Appeal. The dismissal of the appeal means that the order passed by the NCLAT remains in effect.
Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The Civil Appeal was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a Civil Appeal (No. 774 of 2024) brought before the Supreme Court of India. The appeal challenges an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1281 of 2023. The appellant sought interference with the NCLAT's order.
Sanil Prakash Sahu filed a Civil Appeal (No. 774 of 2024) before the Supreme Court of India, challenging an order issued by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT) (Insolvency) No. 1281 of 2023. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited and Another were the respondents in the appeal. The Supreme Court, after reviewing the case, found no reason to interfere with the NCLAT's order and dismissed the Civil Appeal. The dismissal of the appeal means that the order passed by the NCLAT remains in effect.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The Civil Appeal was…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.