The case involves appeals filed by the Resolution Professional. The Supreme Court was to determine whether the Resolution Professional should have filed the appeals, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
The Resolution Professional filed appeals, which the Supreme Court considered. The Court noted that the Resolution Professional should have maintained a neutral stand and that the appeals should have been filed by the aggrieved parties, including the Committee of Creditors of Regen Powertech Private Limited (RPPL) and Regen Infrastructure and Services Private Limited (RISPL). The appeals were dismissed.
Sign in to view the parties.
The appeals wer…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves appeals filed by the Resolution Professional. The Supreme Court was to determine whether the Resolution Professional should have filed the appeals, considering the facts and circumstances of the case.
The Resolution Professional filed appeals, which the Supreme Court considered. The Court noted that the Resolution Professional should have maintained a neutral stand and that the appeals should have been filed by the aggrieved parties, including the Committee of Creditors of Regen Powertech Private Limited (RPPL) and Regen Infrastructure and Services Private Limited (RISPL). The appeals were dismissed.
The appeals wer…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.