The case involves an appeal against a judgment and final order of the High Court of Delhi, which dismissed a contempt petition filed by the Appellants. The dispute originates from a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the company RBT Private Ltd, the Appellants (Rajan Chadha and Rajiv Chadha), the Respondent (Sanjay Arora), and others, concerning the transfer of shareholding and reorganization of the company's management. The Appellants alleged that the Respondent failed to discharge his obligations under the MoU, leading to arbitration proceedings and various orders from the High Court and the arbitrator. The NCLT initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the company, leading to a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The Appellants
…Rajan Chadha and Rajiv Chadha (Appellants) held a combined shareholding of 51.36% in RBT Private Ltd. Sanjay Arora (Respondent) held 25%, and Sumit Gupta held 23.64%. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was executed on December 21, 2019, for the transfer of shareholding and reorganization of the company's management. The Respondent was to purchase the entire shareholding of the Appellants and run the company. The MoU included an arbitration clause for dispute resolution. The Appellants alleged the Respondent failed to discharge his obligations under the MoU, siphoning off assets and defaulting on loan payments. They issued a legal notice and initiated arbitration. The Appellants filed a petition in the High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, seeking to
…Sign in to view the parties.
A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was made…
Appellants issued a notice in terms of Section…
The case involves an appeal against a judgment and final order of the High Court of Delhi, which dismissed a contempt petition filed by the Appellants. The dispute originates from a Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) between the company RBT Private Ltd, the Appellants (Rajan Chadha and Rajiv Chadha), the Respondent (Sanjay Arora), and others, concerning the transfer of shareholding and reorganization of the company's management. The Appellants alleged that the Respondent failed to discharge his obligations under the MoU, leading to arbitration proceedings and various orders from the High Court and the arbitrator. The NCLT initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the company, leading to a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. The Appellants
…Rajan Chadha and Rajiv Chadha (Appellants) held a combined shareholding of 51.36% in RBT Private Ltd. Sanjay Arora (Respondent) held 25%, and Sumit Gupta held 23.64%. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was executed on December 21, 2019, for the transfer of shareholding and reorganization of the company's management. The Respondent was to purchase the entire shareholding of the Appellants and run the company. The MoU included an arbitration clause for dispute resolution. The Appellants alleged the Respondent failed to discharge his obligations under the MoU, siphoning off assets and defaulting on loan payments. They issued a legal notice and initiated arbitration. The Appellants filed a petition in the High Court under Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, seeking to
…A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) was made…
Appellants issued a notice in terms of Section…