The case involves an appeal by Punjab National Bank against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT had set aside an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) that admitted a petition filed by Punjab National Bank under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against M/s Jailaxmi Sugar Products Pvt. Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The NCLAT set aside the NCLT's order on the ground that the application was barred by limitation. The appellant, Punjab National Bank, claims that the Corporate Debtor defaulted in repayment and became a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 31.03.2013. The appellant issued a demand notice dated 30.04.2013 under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
…Punjab National Bank (PNB) filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against M/s Jailaxmi Sugar Products Pvt. Limited, the Corporate Debtor. PNB claimed that sanction letters were issued on 07.05.2010 and 28.09.2010, and a term loan was sanctioned. A letter dated 17.09.2011 restructured existing term loans and granted a fresh term loan. The Corporate Debtor defaulted on 31.03.2013, becoming an NPA. PNB issued a demand notice on 30.04.2013 under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. Balance and Security Confirmation letters were executed on 03.07.2014 and 17.06.2017. PNB, along with Union Bank of India, filed an application in O.A. No.185 of 2014 with DRT, Pune, for a recovery certificate, which was allowed on 01.11.2016. The total
…Sign in to view the parties.
Sanction lette…
Sanction lette…
The case involves an appeal by Punjab National Bank against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT had set aside an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) that admitted a petition filed by Punjab National Bank under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against M/s Jailaxmi Sugar Products Pvt. Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The NCLAT set aside the NCLT's order on the ground that the application was barred by limitation. The appellant, Punjab National Bank, claims that the Corporate Debtor defaulted in repayment and became a Non-Performing Asset (NPA) on 31.03.2013. The appellant issued a demand notice dated 30.04.2013 under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and
…Punjab National Bank (PNB) filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against M/s Jailaxmi Sugar Products Pvt. Limited, the Corporate Debtor. PNB claimed that sanction letters were issued on 07.05.2010 and 28.09.2010, and a term loan was sanctioned. A letter dated 17.09.2011 restructured existing term loans and granted a fresh term loan. The Corporate Debtor defaulted on 31.03.2013, becoming an NPA. PNB issued a demand notice on 30.04.2013 under Section 13(2) of the SARFAESI Act. Balance and Security Confirmation letters were executed on 03.07.2014 and 17.06.2017. PNB, along with Union Bank of India, filed an application in O.A. No.185 of 2014 with DRT, Pune, for a recovery certificate, which was allowed on 01.11.2016. The total
…Sanction lette…
Sanction lette…