The case addresses the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in 2018, which categorized real estate allottees as financial creditors. The amendments were challenged by real estate developers who argued that they violated Article 14 of the Constitution by treating unequals equally and equals unequally, and that they lacked a nexus with the objects of the IBC. The background involves a series of writ petitions filed in the Supreme Court challenging these amendments, stemming from concerns about the treatment of allottees as financial creditors and their representation in the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Insolvency Law Committee suggested these amendments to clarify that real estate allottees are financial creditors,
…The core issue revolves around amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016, specifically those made in 2018. These amendments classified real estate allottees (home buyers) as 'financial creditors'. This classification allows them to initiate insolvency proceedings against real estate developers under Section 7 of the IBC. The amendments were prompted by concerns that allottees were neither fitting the definition of 'financial' nor 'operational' creditors, leaving them in a disadvantaged position during insolvency resolution. The Insolvency Law Committee recommended amendments to clarify that amounts raised from home buyers contribute to the financing of construction and should be treated as financial debt. The Real Estate (Regulation and
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Insolvency and…
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The case addresses the constitutional validity of amendments made to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) in 2018, which categorized real estate allottees as financial creditors. The amendments were challenged by real estate developers who argued that they violated Article 14 of the Constitution by treating unequals equally and equals unequally, and that they lacked a nexus with the objects of the IBC. The background involves a series of writ petitions filed in the Supreme Court challenging these amendments, stemming from concerns about the treatment of allottees as financial creditors and their representation in the Committee of Creditors (CoC). The Insolvency Law Committee suggested these amendments to clarify that real estate allottees are financial creditors,
…The core issue revolves around amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) of 2016, specifically those made in 2018. These amendments classified real estate allottees (home buyers) as 'financial creditors'. This classification allows them to initiate insolvency proceedings against real estate developers under Section 7 of the IBC. The amendments were prompted by concerns that allottees were neither fitting the definition of 'financial' nor 'operational' creditors, leaving them in a disadvantaged position during insolvency resolution. The Insolvency Law Committee recommended amendments to clarify that amounts raised from home buyers contribute to the financing of construction and should be treated as financial debt. The Real Estate (Regulation and
…The Insolvency and…
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…