The case involves a civil appeal against a judgment and order dated 09-02-2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 654 of 2022. The appellant, Paridhi Finvest Private Limited, filed the appeal against the respondents, Value Infracon Buyers Association and Anr. The appeal also includes applications for exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment and for condonation of delay in refiling.
Paridhi Finvest Private Limited filed a civil appeal against Value Infracon Buyers Association and Anr. The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 09-02-2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 654 of 2022. The appellant sought exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment and condonation of delay in refiling the appeal. The Supreme Court considered the appeal and found no reason to interfere with the NCLAT's order, stating that no substantial question of law was involved. The delay in refiling the appeal was condoned. The appeal was subsequently dismissed.
Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The Supreme Court condoned the delay in…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a civil appeal against a judgment and order dated 09-02-2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 654 of 2022. The appellant, Paridhi Finvest Private Limited, filed the appeal against the respondents, Value Infracon Buyers Association and Anr. The appeal also includes applications for exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment and for condonation of delay in refiling.
Paridhi Finvest Private Limited filed a civil appeal against Value Infracon Buyers Association and Anr. The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated 09-02-2024 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) in Company Appeal (AT)(Insolvency) No. 654 of 2022. The appellant sought exemption from filing a certified copy of the impugned judgment and condonation of delay in refiling the appeal. The Supreme Court considered the appeal and found no reason to interfere with the NCLAT's order, stating that no substantial question of law was involved. The delay in refiling the appeal was condoned. The appeal was subsequently dismissed.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
The Supreme Court condoned the delay in…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.