The case involves a civil appeal before the Supreme Court of India against a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellants are challenging the NCLAT's decision, while the respondents are contesting the appeal. The Supreme Court is reviewing the impugned judgment and order of the NCLAT.
The case is a Civil Appeal No. 4654 of 2022 before the Supreme Court of India. The appellants, Neeraj Singal & Anr., challenged a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The respondents are Tata Steel Ltd. & Anr. The Supreme Court heard arguments from both sides and considered the submissions made before the NCLAT and the Court itself. The appellants are the erstwhile Promoters. The Court agreed with the NCLAT's view and dismissed the appeal. The Court noted that if the submission on behalf of the appellants is accepted, the Resolution Plan shall not be workable at all. The Court also noted that the appellants cannot be continued to be in the Company in any capacity as shareholders.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Civil Appeal No.…
The Supreme Court…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a civil appeal before the Supreme Court of India against a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The appellants are challenging the NCLAT's decision, while the respondents are contesting the appeal. The Supreme Court is reviewing the impugned judgment and order of the NCLAT.
The case is a Civil Appeal No. 4654 of 2022 before the Supreme Court of India. The appellants, Neeraj Singal & Anr., challenged a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The respondents are Tata Steel Ltd. & Anr. The Supreme Court heard arguments from both sides and considered the submissions made before the NCLAT and the Court itself. The appellants are the erstwhile Promoters. The Court agreed with the NCLAT's view and dismissed the appeal. The Court noted that if the submission on behalf of the appellants is accepted, the Resolution Plan shall not be workable at all. The Court also noted that the appellants cannot be continued to be in the Company in any capacity as shareholders.
The Civil Appeal No.…
The Supreme Court…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.