The case arises from a Civil Appeal with Diary No. 46628 of 2024. The appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 2024-08-21 in IA No. 626/2024, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed the appeal against IVRCL Chengappalli Tollways Ltd & Ors. The primary issue revolves around the condonation of delay in refiling or curing defects.
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a civil appeal against IVRCL Chengappalli Tollways Ltd & Ors, challenging a judgment and order dated 2024-08-21 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai. The appeal was filed with a delay, and the initial matter concerned the condonation of this delay. The Supreme Court initially condoned the delay. However, upon further consideration, the court found no good ground or reason to interfere with the impugned judgment, which held that the appeal preferred by NHAI was barred by limitation. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal. The relevance of the limitation period is that it determines the timeliness of the appeal and the court's jurisdiction to hear the case.
Sign in to view the parties.
Final judgment and order passed by the National…
The matter was called…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case arises from a Civil Appeal with Diary No. 46628 of 2024. The appeal challenges the final judgment and order dated 2024-08-21 in IA No. 626/2024, passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Chennai. The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed the appeal against IVRCL Chengappalli Tollways Ltd & Ors. The primary issue revolves around the condonation of delay in refiling or curing defects.
The National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) filed a civil appeal against IVRCL Chengappalli Tollways Ltd & Ors, challenging a judgment and order dated 2024-08-21 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai. The appeal was filed with a delay, and the initial matter concerned the condonation of this delay. The Supreme Court initially condoned the delay. However, upon further consideration, the court found no good ground or reason to interfere with the impugned judgment, which held that the appeal preferred by NHAI was barred by limitation. Consequently, the court dismissed the appeal. The relevance of the limitation period is that it determines the timeliness of the appeal and the court's jurisdiction to hear the case.
Final judgment and order passed by the National…
The matter was called…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.