The case involves an appeal against the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh Bench, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi. The appellant had filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, which was dismissed as being barred by limitation. The Appellate Tribunal pointed out that the right to sue accrued on 28.02.2002, and there was no acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
M/S Invent Asset Securitisation and Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against M/S Girnar Fibres Ltd. The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the application, finding it barred by limitation. The right to sue accrued on 28.02.2002. The appellant attempted to introduce documents related to loan restructuring and a revival letter, but these were deemed insufficient. The appellant's intent was to invoke the IBC for recovery against the corporate debtor. The Supreme Court heard the appeal against the NCLAT's decision.
Sign in to view the parties.
The date on which the…
Date of the impugned judgment passed by the…
The case involves an appeal against the decision of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh Bench, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Principal Bench, New Delhi. The appellant had filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, which was dismissed as being barred by limitation. The Appellate Tribunal pointed out that the right to sue accrued on 28.02.2002, and there was no acknowledgement of liability under Section 18 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
M/S Invent Asset Securitisation and Reconstruction Pvt. Ltd. filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 against M/S Girnar Fibres Ltd. The National Company Law Tribunal, Chandigarh Bench, and the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi, dismissed the application, finding it barred by limitation. The right to sue accrued on 28.02.2002. The appellant attempted to introduce documents related to loan restructuring and a revival letter, but these were deemed insufficient. The appellant's intent was to invoke the IBC for recovery against the corporate debtor. The Supreme Court heard the appeal against the NCLAT's decision.
The date on which the…
Date of the impugned judgment passed by the…