The case involves an appeal by Mothers Pride Dairy India Private Limited against Portrait Advertising and Marketing Private Limited. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had previously passed an order. The Supreme Court found the NCLAT's order to be correct but decided to exercise its power under Article 142 of the Constitution to accept a settlement reached between the parties.
Mothers Pride Dairy India Private Limited filed an appeal against Portrait Advertising and Marketing Private Limited. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had issued an order, which the Supreme Court found to be correct. However, the parties reached a settlement, which the Supreme Court decided to accept under Article 142 of the Constitution. The appeal was then disposed of, and no order was made regarding costs. The case was heard on July 28, 2017.
Sign in to view the parties.
The appeal was called…
The Supreme Court…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal by Mothers Pride Dairy India Private Limited against Portrait Advertising and Marketing Private Limited. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had previously passed an order. The Supreme Court found the NCLAT's order to be correct but decided to exercise its power under Article 142 of the Constitution to accept a settlement reached between the parties.
Mothers Pride Dairy India Private Limited filed an appeal against Portrait Advertising and Marketing Private Limited. The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) had issued an order, which the Supreme Court found to be correct. However, the parties reached a settlement, which the Supreme Court decided to accept under Article 142 of the Constitution. The appeal was then disposed of, and no order was made regarding costs. The case was heard on July 28, 2017.
The appeal was called…
The Supreme Court…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.