The case involves civil appeals directed against a common judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai Bench, concerning the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Appu Hotels Limited under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT reversed the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, which had approved a resolution plan, and remanded the matter to the committee of creditors (CoC) for fresh consideration. The appeals challenge the NCLAT's decision, raising issues about the valuation process, eligibility of the resolution applicant, and consideration of a settlement proposal from the promoter.
Appu Hotels Limited faced CIRP after defaulting on loan repayments. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited (TFCI) initiated CIRP under Section 7 of the IBC. The resolution plan submitted by M.K. Rajagopalan was approved by 87.39% of the CoC. The NCLT approved the resolution plan, but the NCLAT reversed this decision, citing irregularities in the valuation process, ineligibility of the resolution applicant, and non-consideration of the promoter's settlement proposal. The NCLAT directed the resolution professional to proceed with CIRP from the stage of publication of Form G and to invite fresh EOIs. The promoter submitted a settlement proposal under Section 12-A of the Code, which was initially rejected but later approved by 100% of the CoC. The resolution
…Sign in to view the parties.
Application for initiation of CIRP was filed by…
Matter was heard in…
The case involves civil appeals directed against a common judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), Chennai Bench, concerning the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) of Appu Hotels Limited under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The NCLAT reversed the order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chennai, which had approved a resolution plan, and remanded the matter to the committee of creditors (CoC) for fresh consideration. The appeals challenge the NCLAT's decision, raising issues about the valuation process, eligibility of the resolution applicant, and consideration of a settlement proposal from the promoter.
Appu Hotels Limited faced CIRP after defaulting on loan repayments. Tourism Finance Corporation of India Limited (TFCI) initiated CIRP under Section 7 of the IBC. The resolution plan submitted by M.K. Rajagopalan was approved by 87.39% of the CoC. The NCLT approved the resolution plan, but the NCLAT reversed this decision, citing irregularities in the valuation process, ineligibility of the resolution applicant, and non-consideration of the promoter's settlement proposal. The NCLAT directed the resolution professional to proceed with CIRP from the stage of publication of Form G and to invite fresh EOIs. The promoter submitted a settlement proposal under Section 12-A of the Code, which was initially rejected but later approved by 100% of the CoC. The resolution
…Application for initiation of CIRP was filed by…
Matter was heard in…