The case arises out of an impugned final judgment and order dated 2019-09-16 in RPL No.38/2019 2019-07-08 in NOM No.19/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay. The petitioner claims that the High Court erred in its interpretation of Section 14(1)A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Malayan Banking Berhad filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) against Ushdev International Ltd. & Ors. The petition challenges a final judgment and order dated 2019-09-16 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in RPL No.38/2019 dated 2019-07-08 in NOM No.19/2016. The petitioner argues that the High Court erred in interpreting Section 14(1)A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming the moratorium provision only applies to suits filed against the corporate debtor, not by it. The suit in question was filed by the corporate debtor.
Sign in to view the parties.
Date of the impugned final judgment and order…
Reference to RPL…
The case arises out of an impugned final judgment and order dated 2019-09-16 in RPL No.38/2019 2019-07-08 in NOM No.19/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Bombay. The petitioner claims that the High Court erred in its interpretation of Section 14(1)A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.
Malayan Banking Berhad filed a Special Leave Petition (Civil) against Ushdev International Ltd. & Ors. The petition challenges a final judgment and order dated 2019-09-16 passed by the High Court of Judicature at Bombay in RPL No.38/2019 dated 2019-07-08 in NOM No.19/2016. The petitioner argues that the High Court erred in interpreting Section 14(1)A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, claiming the moratorium provision only applies to suits filed against the corporate debtor, not by it. The suit in question was filed by the corporate debtor.
Date of the impugned final judgment and order…
Reference to RPL…