The case involves a civil appeal against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT order was dated 21 October 2022, and it was clarified by an order dated 2 December 2022. The specific Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) numbers involved are 987, 643, 801, 915, and 771, all from 2022. The Supreme Court is reviewing the NCLAT's decision.
Jalan Fritsch Consortium filed a civil appeal against the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Anr. The appeal challenged an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 21 October 2022, which was later clarified on 2 December 2022. The NCLAT order pertained to Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) Nos 987, 643, 801, 915 and 771 of 2022. The Supreme Court heard the appeal on January 30, 2023.
Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
A clarification order…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a civil appeal against an order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The NCLAT order was dated 21 October 2022, and it was clarified by an order dated 2 December 2022. The specific Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) numbers involved are 987, 643, 801, 915, and 771, all from 2022. The Supreme Court is reviewing the NCLAT's decision.
Jalan Fritsch Consortium filed a civil appeal against the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Anr. The appeal challenged an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 21 October 2022, which was later clarified on 2 December 2022. The NCLAT order pertained to Company Appeal (AT) (Ins) Nos 987, 643, 801, 915 and 771 of 2022. The Supreme Court heard the appeal on January 30, 2023.
The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal…
A clarification order…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.