The Supreme Court of India initiated a Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 to address the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court took cognizance of the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants in filing proceedings physically. Several interlocutory applications (IAs) were filed, including those seeking clarification/direction and intervention.
The Supreme Court initiated Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 to address the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court acknowledged the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants in physically filing proceedings. Several IAs were filed, seeking clarification, direction, and intervention. The court considered the impact of the pandemic and lockdowns on the ability of parties to adhere to prescribed limitation periods under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court's decision was influenced by the need to ensure access to justice during the pandemic.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Court passed an…
All periods of…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The Supreme Court of India initiated a Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 to address the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court took cognizance of the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants in filing proceedings physically. Several interlocutory applications (IAs) were filed, including those seeking clarification/direction and intervention.
The Supreme Court initiated Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No. 3 of 2020 to address the extension of limitation periods due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The court acknowledged the difficulties faced by lawyers and litigants in physically filing proceedings. Several IAs were filed, seeking clarification, direction, and intervention. The court considered the impact of the pandemic and lockdowns on the ability of parties to adhere to prescribed limitation periods under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 and the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The court's decision was influenced by the need to ensure access to justice during the pandemic.
The Court passed an…
All periods of…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.