The case involves a civil appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which admitted a petition by an operational creditor for an amount of Rs. 1.67 Crores. The NCLT's order dated 08.01.2018 was challenged. An impugned order dated 22.01.2018 merely adjourned the matter.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted a petition by an operational creditor for Rs. 1.67 Crores via an order dated 08.01.2018. The appellant challenged this order. An impugned order dated 22.01.2018 adjourned the matter. The parties had entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 18.01.2018. The Supreme Court took this settlement agreement on record and set aside the NCLT's order. The key fact is the existence of a settlement agreement between the parties prior to the Supreme Court's intervention, which influenced the court's decision to set aside the NCLT order.
Sign in to view the parties.
The National Company Law Tribunal admitted the…
Parties entere…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves a civil appeal against an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) which admitted a petition by an operational creditor for an amount of Rs. 1.67 Crores. The NCLT's order dated 08.01.2018 was challenged. An impugned order dated 22.01.2018 merely adjourned the matter.
The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) admitted a petition by an operational creditor for Rs. 1.67 Crores via an order dated 08.01.2018. The appellant challenged this order. An impugned order dated 22.01.2018 adjourned the matter. The parties had entered into a Settlement Agreement dated 18.01.2018. The Supreme Court took this settlement agreement on record and set aside the NCLT's order. The key fact is the existence of a settlement agreement between the parties prior to the Supreme Court's intervention, which influenced the court's decision to set aside the NCLT order.
The National Company Law Tribunal admitted the…
Parties entere…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.