The Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) filed a civil appeal against Fanendra Harakchand Munot & Anr., arising from a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The EPFO sought compliance with timelines under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
The Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) filed a civil appeal against Fanendra Harakchand Munot & Anr. The appeal arose from a final judgment and order dated 19-04-2023 in CAAT(I) No. 427/2023 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The EPFO sought compliance with the timelines provided under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Supreme Court heard the matter on 2023-08-25. The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the impugned judgment does not affect the rights of the EPFO to proceed in accordance with law, in view of Section 36(4)(a) of the IBC.
Sign in to view the parties.
Final judgment and order passed by the National…
The matter was called…
The Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) filed a civil appeal against Fanendra Harakchand Munot & Anr., arising from a judgment and order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The EPFO sought compliance with timelines under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC).
The Employees Provident Fund Organization (EPFO) filed a civil appeal against Fanendra Harakchand Munot & Anr. The appeal arose from a final judgment and order dated 19-04-2023 in CAAT(I) No. 427/2023 passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT). The EPFO sought compliance with the timelines provided under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC). The Supreme Court heard the matter on 2023-08-25. The court dismissed the appeal, stating that the impugned judgment does not affect the rights of the EPFO to proceed in accordance with law, in view of Section 36(4)(a) of the IBC.
Final judgment and order passed by the National…
The matter was called…