The case involves an appeal before the Supreme Court of India. The respondent's counsel submitted that the matter should be sent back to the Tribunal for consideration of the admission of the insolvency application after issuing limited notice to the Corporate Debtor. A prior decision of the Court in Innoventive Industries Limited vs. ICICI Bank and another was referenced.
The appellant, D.R. Balkrishna Raja, filed a civil appeal before the Supreme Court of India against Indian Bank & Anr. The respondent's counsel requested that the matter be sent back to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the insolvency application after providing limited notice to the Corporate Debtor. The Court considered a prior decision in Innoventive Industries Limited vs. ICICI Bank and another. The key fact is the respondent's request for remand and the Court's reliance on a prior decision related to insolvency proceedings.
Sign in to view the parties.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an appeal before the Supreme Court of India. The respondent's counsel submitted that the matter should be sent back to the Tribunal for consideration of the admission of the insolvency application after issuing limited notice to the Corporate Debtor. A prior decision of the Court in Innoventive Industries Limited vs. ICICI Bank and another was referenced.
The appellant, D.R. Balkrishna Raja, filed a civil appeal before the Supreme Court of India against Indian Bank & Anr. The respondent's counsel requested that the matter be sent back to the Tribunal for reconsideration of the insolvency application after providing limited notice to the Corporate Debtor. The Court considered a prior decision in Innoventive Industries Limited vs. ICICI Bank and another. The key fact is the respondent's request for remand and the Court's reliance on a prior decision related to insolvency proceedings.
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, set aside…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.