The appeal arises from a complaint dated 16.03.2005 against Gurvinder Singh, Respondent No.1, a Chartered Accountant, relating to the sale of 100 shares in 1999, which were transferred to the Chartered Accountant's own name. The Disciplinary Committee found the Respondent No.1-Chartered Accountant's conduct derogatory and unbecoming, holding him guilty of 'other Misconduct' under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India recommended to the High Court to remove the Chartered Accountant for six months. The High Court, in its judgment dated 16.08.2016, concluded that the respondent was acting as an individual in his dealings and not as a Chartered Accountant.
A complaint was filed on 16.03.2005 against Gurvinder Singh, a Chartered Accountant, concerning the sale of 100 shares in 1999. These shares were transferred to the Chartered Accountant's name. The Disciplinary Committee determined that Gurvinder Singh's conduct was derogatory and unbecoming, constituting 'other Misconduct' under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India recommended that the High Court remove Gurvinder Singh from the rolls for six months. The High Court, in its judgment dated 16.08.2016, concluded that Gurvinder Singh was acting as an individual in his dealings and not in his capacity as a Chartered Accountant. The Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court's
…Sign in to view the parties.
A complaint was filed against Gurvinder Singh, a…
The High Court delivered a judgment…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeal arises from a complaint dated 16.03.2005 against Gurvinder Singh, Respondent No.1, a Chartered Accountant, relating to the sale of 100 shares in 1999, which were transferred to the Chartered Accountant's own name. The Disciplinary Committee found the Respondent No.1-Chartered Accountant's conduct derogatory and unbecoming, holding him guilty of 'other Misconduct' under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India recommended to the High Court to remove the Chartered Accountant for six months. The High Court, in its judgment dated 16.08.2016, concluded that the respondent was acting as an individual in his dealings and not as a Chartered Accountant.
A complaint was filed on 16.03.2005 against Gurvinder Singh, a Chartered Accountant, concerning the sale of 100 shares in 1999. These shares were transferred to the Chartered Accountant's name. The Disciplinary Committee determined that Gurvinder Singh's conduct was derogatory and unbecoming, constituting 'other Misconduct' under Section 22 read with Section 21 of the Chartered Accountants Act, 1949. The Council of the Institute of Chartered Accountants of India recommended that the High Court remove Gurvinder Singh from the rolls for six months. The High Court, in its judgment dated 16.08.2016, concluded that Gurvinder Singh was acting as an individual in his dealings and not in his capacity as a Chartered Accountant. The Supreme Court disagreed with the High Court's
…A complaint was filed against Gurvinder Singh, a…
The High Court delivered a judgment…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.