The appellant-husband challenged the order dated 12.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, which granted maintenance to the respondent-wife at Rs.1,00,000 per month and Rs.50,000 per month to each of the two children. The Family Court, Surat, had previously granted Rs.6,000 per month to the wife and Rs.3,000 per month to each child. The wife and children approached the High Court through a Revision Application, which was allowed, leading to the enhanced maintenance order. The High Court considered the appellant's business ownership and manager employment. The appellant failed to produce income-tax documents despite being an assessee, leading to an adverse inference. The High Court accepted the respondents' claim for enhanced maintenance, directing
…The appellant, Apurva @ Apurvo Bhuvanbabu Mandal, challenged a High Court order that increased maintenance payments to his wife, Dolly & Ors. The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad had ordered the appellant to pay Rs. 1,00,000 per month to his wife and Rs. 50,000 per month to each of his two children. This was a significant increase from the Family Court's original order of Rs. 6,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month for each child. The High Court's decision was based on the appellant's status as a businessman owning a diamond factory. The appellant failed to produce income-tax documents, leading the High Court to draw an adverse inference. The appellant claimed his income was exaggerated and that his wife was self-employed and did not require
…Sign in to view the parties.
High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed an…
Supreme Court passed interim directions,…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appellant-husband challenged the order dated 12.09.2022 passed by the High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad, which granted maintenance to the respondent-wife at Rs.1,00,000 per month and Rs.50,000 per month to each of the two children. The Family Court, Surat, had previously granted Rs.6,000 per month to the wife and Rs.3,000 per month to each child. The wife and children approached the High Court through a Revision Application, which was allowed, leading to the enhanced maintenance order. The High Court considered the appellant's business ownership and manager employment. The appellant failed to produce income-tax documents despite being an assessee, leading to an adverse inference. The High Court accepted the respondents' claim for enhanced maintenance, directing
…The appellant, Apurva @ Apurvo Bhuvanbabu Mandal, challenged a High Court order that increased maintenance payments to his wife, Dolly & Ors. The High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad had ordered the appellant to pay Rs. 1,00,000 per month to his wife and Rs. 50,000 per month to each of his two children. This was a significant increase from the Family Court's original order of Rs. 6,000 per month for the wife and Rs. 3,000 per month for each child. The High Court's decision was based on the appellant's status as a businessman owning a diamond factory. The appellant failed to produce income-tax documents, leading the High Court to draw an adverse inference. The appellant claimed his income was exaggerated and that his wife was self-employed and did not require
…High Court of Gujarat at Ahmedabad passed an…
Supreme Court passed interim directions,…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.