The appeals before the Supreme Court challenge the decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which had allowed appeals filed by lender-banks of Jayprakash Associates Limited (JAL) claiming to be financial creditors of Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had initially rejected this claim. The Supreme Court is considering whether the lender-banks of JAL can be regarded as financial creditors of JIL.
Jayprakash Associates Limited (JAL) lender-banks filed appeals before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) claiming to be financial creditors of Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had rejected this claim. The NCLAT allowed the appeals, leading to the current challenge before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard arguments and expressed a preliminary view that the lender-banks of JAL cannot be considered financial creditors of JIL. The court stayed the NCLAT's order to prevent confusion in the revival process of JIL and the constitution of its Committee of Creditors (CoC). The core factual dispute revolves around the financial relationship between JAL's lender-banks and JIL, and whether this relationship
…Sign in to view the parties.
The matters wer…
Arguments in Civil…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The appeals before the Supreme Court challenge the decision of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT), which had allowed appeals filed by lender-banks of Jayprakash Associates Limited (JAL) claiming to be financial creditors of Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had initially rejected this claim. The Supreme Court is considering whether the lender-banks of JAL can be regarded as financial creditors of JIL.
Jayprakash Associates Limited (JAL) lender-banks filed appeals before the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) claiming to be financial creditors of Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL). The National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) had rejected this claim. The NCLAT allowed the appeals, leading to the current challenge before the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court heard arguments and expressed a preliminary view that the lender-banks of JAL cannot be considered financial creditors of JIL. The court stayed the NCLAT's order to prevent confusion in the revival process of JIL and the constitution of its Committee of Creditors (CoC). The core factual dispute revolves around the financial relationship between JAL's lender-banks and JIL, and whether this relationship
…The matters wer…
Arguments in Civil…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.