The case involves appeals against an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which overturned an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The NCLT had declared certain transactions by Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL), the corporate debtor, as preferential, undervalued, and fraudulent. These transactions involved mortgaging JIL's properties to secure loans for its holding company, Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL). The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) initiated proceedings to avoid these transactions. Additionally, the case addresses whether lenders of JAL can be categorized as financial creditors of JIL.
Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL), a corporate debtor, underwent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). JIL's Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) filed an application alleging that JIL had mortgaged its properties to secure loans for its holding company, Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL). These transactions were questioned as being preferential, undervalued, and fraudulent. JAL held approximately 71.64% equity shareholding in JIL as on 31.03.2017. IDBI Bank Limited initiated CIRP against JIL for defaulting on Rs. 526.11 crores. NCLT initiated CIRP on 09.08.2017. The NCLT initially accepted the IRP's application regarding six mortgage transactions, but NCLAT overturned this. The mortgage deeds in question were executed between 2016 and 2017. The lenders of
…Sign in to view the parties.
Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) was…
Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL) was declared…
The case involves appeals against an order by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which overturned an order by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). The NCLT had declared certain transactions by Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL), the corporate debtor, as preferential, undervalued, and fraudulent. These transactions involved mortgaging JIL's properties to secure loans for its holding company, Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL). The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) initiated proceedings to avoid these transactions. Additionally, the case addresses whether lenders of JAL can be categorized as financial creditors of JIL.
Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL), a corporate debtor, underwent Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). JIL's Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) filed an application alleging that JIL had mortgaged its properties to secure loans for its holding company, Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL). These transactions were questioned as being preferential, undervalued, and fraudulent. JAL held approximately 71.64% equity shareholding in JIL as on 31.03.2017. IDBI Bank Limited initiated CIRP against JIL for defaulting on Rs. 526.11 crores. NCLT initiated CIRP on 09.08.2017. The NCLT initially accepted the IRP's application regarding six mortgage transactions, but NCLAT overturned this. The mortgage deeds in question were executed between 2016 and 2017. The lenders of
…Jaiprakash Associates Limited (JAL) was…
Jaypee Infratech Limited (JIL) was declared…