The appeal arises from a judgment by the Bombay High Court regarding a Commercial Arbitration Petition. The High Court substituted an arbitrator but ruled that proceedings during a moratorium period were null. The appellants challenged this ruling.
Appellants and Respondent entered into a partnership firm named “M/s Anmol Alliance” to develop and construct an SRA project.
Disputes arose between the appellants and the respondent, leading to Commercial Arbitration Petition No.347/2019.
The Bombay High Court passed an order on 09.07.2019 accepting the minutes of order recording them as consent terms.
The High Court appointed Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.N. Patel as the Arbitrator.
NCLT Mumbai passed an order on 26.09.2019 admitting the respondent to CIRP and imposing a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC.
The High Court passed an order on 15.03.2022 finding that the Interim Resolution Professional had become functus officio.
…Sign in to view the parties.
High Court passed an…
NCLT Mumbai passed an order admitting the…
The appeal arises from a judgment by the Bombay High Court regarding a Commercial Arbitration Petition. The High Court substituted an arbitrator but ruled that proceedings during a moratorium period were null. The appellants challenged this ruling.
Appellants and Respondent entered into a partnership firm named “M/s Anmol Alliance” to develop and construct an SRA project.
Disputes arose between the appellants and the respondent, leading to Commercial Arbitration Petition No.347/2019.
The Bombay High Court passed an order on 09.07.2019 accepting the minutes of order recording them as consent terms.
The High Court appointed Hon'ble Mr. Justice J.N. Patel as the Arbitrator.
NCLT Mumbai passed an order on 26.09.2019 admitting the respondent to CIRP and imposing a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC.
The High Court passed an order on 15.03.2022 finding that the Interim Resolution Professional had become functus officio.
…High Court passed an…
NCLT Mumbai passed an order admitting the…