The case involves an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Shri Paramsukh Edible Foods Pvt Ltd by Rakesh Kumar Goyal, an operational creditor.
Rakesh Kumar Goyal, Proprietor of M/s Mohini Food Product, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as an operational creditor.
The operational creditor claimed a net amount of Rs. 1,42,46,178/- along with interest of Rs. 28,58,480/- was due from the corporate debtor.
The corporate debtor, Shri Paramsukh Edible Foods Pvt Ltd, is a private limited company incorporated on 3rd February, 2020.
The applicant claimed to have supplied Mustard Seeds to the respondent, with 8 invoices raised between 05.08.2021 and 31.08.2021 remaining unpaid.
The corporate debtor argued that the debt amount was not in default, there was no agreement on interest payment, and the e-way bill address was incorrect.
…Sign in to view the parties.
The instant petition…
The petition was…
The case involves an application filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, for the initiation of the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Shri Paramsukh Edible Foods Pvt Ltd by Rakesh Kumar Goyal, an operational creditor.
Rakesh Kumar Goyal, Proprietor of M/s Mohini Food Product, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, as an operational creditor.
The operational creditor claimed a net amount of Rs. 1,42,46,178/- along with interest of Rs. 28,58,480/- was due from the corporate debtor.
The corporate debtor, Shri Paramsukh Edible Foods Pvt Ltd, is a private limited company incorporated on 3rd February, 2020.
The applicant claimed to have supplied Mustard Seeds to the respondent, with 8 invoices raised between 05.08.2021 and 31.08.2021 remaining unpaid.
The corporate debtor argued that the debt amount was not in default, there was no agreement on interest payment, and the e-way bill address was incorrect.
…The instant petition…
The petition was…