The case involves an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, is involved. The respondent was deemed ex-parte due to not filing vakalat within the stipulated time. The IRP filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons.
State Bank of India filed a petition against Yerra Srinivas Vishwa Infrastructures and Services Pvt Ltd. The respondent was deemed ex-parte because their advocate, Mr. Mohammed Rhaeem, though allowed to file vakalat on their representation from 2022-02-21, failed to do so within the time frame stipulated by the order dated 2022-02-21. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons. The Tribunal discharged Mr. Manikwar as IRP.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on…
Shri Learned Advocate Mr. Mohammed Rhaeem…
The case involves an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, is involved. The respondent was deemed ex-parte due to not filing vakalat within the stipulated time. The IRP filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons.
State Bank of India filed a petition against Yerra Srinivas Vishwa Infrastructures and Services Pvt Ltd. The respondent was deemed ex-parte because their advocate, Mr. Mohammed Rhaeem, though allowed to file vakalat on their representation from 2022-02-21, failed to do so within the time frame stipulated by the order dated 2022-02-21. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons. The Tribunal discharged Mr. Manikwar as IRP.
Hearing held on…
Shri Learned Advocate Mr. Mohammed Rhaeem…