The case involves an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, was present. The respondent was deemed ex-parte due to failure to file vakalatnama within the stipulated time, despite being allowed to do so. The IRP filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons.
State Bank of India initiated proceedings as the petitioner. Y Narsinga Rao & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd are the respondents. Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The respondent was deemed ex-parte because their vakalatnama was not filed within the stipulated time, despite being allowed to do so based on the order dated 2022-02-21. The IRP filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons. The Tribunal discharged Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar as IRP.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order date re…
Hearing he…
The case involves an application under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, was present. The respondent was deemed ex-parte due to failure to file vakalatnama within the stipulated time, despite being allowed to do so. The IRP filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons.
State Bank of India initiated proceedings as the petitioner. Y Narsinga Rao & Vishwa Infrastructures And Services Pvt Ltd are the respondents. Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The respondent was deemed ex-parte because their vakalatnama was not filed within the stipulated time, despite being allowed to do so based on the order dated 2022-02-21. The IRP filed IA(IBC)235/2022 seeking discharge due to medical reasons. The Tribunal discharged Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar as IRP.
Order date re…
Hearing he…