The case involves multiple petitions (CP(IBC)/15/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/16/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/17/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/18/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/19/KOB/2022) filed by State Bank of India under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019, against the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Propyl Packaging Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) had already been initiated against the Corporate Debtor, followed by a liquidation order due to the absence of a resolution plan.
State Bank of India (SBI) filed petitions under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, against Mr. Rajesh K S, Mr. Satheesh Babu V. K, Mr. Saleesh K Satheesh, Mrs. Bindya Saleesh, and Mrs. Sindhu Rajesh, who are the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Propyl Packaging Limited. The Corporate Debtor had previously undergone Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), which resulted in a liquidation order due to the absence of a viable resolution plan. SBI had initially sanctioned an overdraft facility of Rs 7.05 Crore and an International Letter of Credit Facility of Rs.4.70 Crore to the Corporate Debtor, secured by a mortgage of properties. Subsequently, the credit facilities were enhanced to 16.80 Crore. The Corporate Debtor
…Sign in to view the parties.
SBI sanctioned an overdraft facility of Rs…
Corporate Debtor…
The case involves multiple petitions (CP(IBC)/15/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/16/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/17/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/18/KOB/2022, CP(IBC)/19/KOB/2022) filed by State Bank of India under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, read with Rule 7(2) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy (Application to Adjudicating Authority for Insolvency Resolution Process for Personal Guarantors to Corporate Debtors) Rules, 2019, against the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Propyl Packaging Limited. The Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) had already been initiated against the Corporate Debtor, followed by a liquidation order due to the absence of a resolution plan.
State Bank of India (SBI) filed petitions under Section 95(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016, against Mr. Rajesh K S, Mr. Satheesh Babu V. K, Mr. Saleesh K Satheesh, Mrs. Bindya Saleesh, and Mrs. Sindhu Rajesh, who are the personal guarantors of the Corporate Debtor, M/s. Propyl Packaging Limited. The Corporate Debtor had previously undergone Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), which resulted in a liquidation order due to the absence of a viable resolution plan. SBI had initially sanctioned an overdraft facility of Rs 7.05 Crore and an International Letter of Credit Facility of Rs.4.70 Crore to the Corporate Debtor, secured by a mortgage of properties. Subsequently, the credit facilities were enhanced to 16.80 Crore. The Corporate Debtor
…SBI sanctioned an overdraft facility of Rs…
Corporate Debtor…