The case involves a petition filed under Section 95(1) of an unspecified act. The petitioner is State Bank of India and the respondent is Rajesh Sonthalia. The matter was heard on May 19, 2022. The proof of service of the demand notice of the personal guarantor was not filed with the petition, and no postal receipts were attached.
State Bank of India filed a petition against Rajesh Sonthalia. During the hearing on May 19, 2022, it was observed that the proof of service of the demand notice to the personal guarantor was not filed along with the petition, and no postal receipts were attached. The counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction, requested to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition. This request was made because of the initial filing's deficiencies. The court then dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition.
Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on May 19, 2022, at 10:30 A.M.…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 95(1) of an unspecified act. The petitioner is State Bank of India and the respondent is Rajesh Sonthalia. The matter was heard on May 19, 2022. The proof of service of the demand notice of the personal guarantor was not filed with the petition, and no postal receipts were attached.
State Bank of India filed a petition against Rajesh Sonthalia. During the hearing on May 19, 2022, it was observed that the proof of service of the demand notice to the personal guarantor was not filed along with the petition, and no postal receipts were attached. The counsel for the petitioner, upon instruction, requested to withdraw the petition with the liberty to file a fresh petition. This request was made because of the initial filing's deficiencies. The court then dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file a fresh petition.
Hearing held on May 19, 2022, at 10:30 A.M.…