State Bank of India initiated proceedings as the petitioner against J. Sunitha & Vishwa Infrastructures and Services Pvt Ltd. The respondent was deemed ex-parte because their advocate, Mr. Mohammed Rhaeem, although allowed to file vakalat on his representation from 2022-02-21, failed to do so within the stipulated time. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, sought discharge from his duties due to medical reasons by filing IA(IBC)235/2022. The relevance of the respondent being ex-parte is that the proceedings can continue without their active participation. The IRP's medical reasons are relevant as they impact his ability to continue in his role.

State Bank of India initiated proceedings as the petitioner against J. Sunitha & Vishwa Infrastructures and Services Pvt Ltd. The respondent was deemed ex-parte because their advocate, Mr. Mohammed Rhaeem, although allowed to file vakalat on his representation from 2022-02-21, failed to do so within the stipulated time. The Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), Mr. Kiran Kumar Manikwar, sought discharge from his duties due to medical reasons by filing IA(IBC)235/2022. The relevance of the respondent being ex-parte is that the proceedings can continue without their active participation. The IRP's medical reasons are relevant as they impact his ability to continue in his role.