The case involves multiple interlocutory applications (I.A. 3795/ND/2022, I.A. 3796/ND/2022, I.A. 3799/ND/2022, I.A. 1036/PB/2022, IA/4242/PB/2021, IA/3870/ND/2022, IA/4085/ND/2022, New IA/3976/ND/2022) filed in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. These applications primarily seek intervention and impleadment in the main petition, IB/284(PB)/2021, related to the corporate insolvency resolution process of Spaze Towers Private Limited. The applicants, including financial creditors and unit allottees, claim rights based on purchased units in the 'Spaze Arrow' project and alleged breaches of investment return schemes and collaboration agreements. The corporate debtor opposes these interventions,
…The applicants, including Surinder Pal Singh, Prakash Agarwal, Amit Kumar Manglam, and Ishaan Singh, filed applications seeking intervention and impleadment in the main insolvency petition (IB/284(PB)/2021) against Spaze Towers Private Limited. These applicants claimed to be financial creditors or unit allottees in the 'Spaze Arrow' project developed by Spaze Towers. They argued that Spaze Towers had defaulted on investment return schemes and breached collaboration agreements. The corporate debtor, Spaze Towers, opposed the intervention, asserting that these applicants lacked the locus standi to intervene at the pre-admission stage of a Section 7 application under the IBC. The corporate debtor relied on precedents stating that only the financial creditor and the
…Sign in to view the parties.
Ishan Singh filed a petition under Section 7…
HRERA Gurugram site inspection report showed…
The case involves multiple interlocutory applications (I.A. 3795/ND/2022, I.A. 3796/ND/2022, I.A. 3799/ND/2022, I.A. 1036/PB/2022, IA/4242/PB/2021, IA/3870/ND/2022, IA/4085/ND/2022, New IA/3976/ND/2022) filed in the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. These applications primarily seek intervention and impleadment in the main petition, IB/284(PB)/2021, related to the corporate insolvency resolution process of Spaze Towers Private Limited. The applicants, including financial creditors and unit allottees, claim rights based on purchased units in the 'Spaze Arrow' project and alleged breaches of investment return schemes and collaboration agreements. The corporate debtor opposes these interventions,
…The applicants, including Surinder Pal Singh, Prakash Agarwal, Amit Kumar Manglam, and Ishaan Singh, filed applications seeking intervention and impleadment in the main insolvency petition (IB/284(PB)/2021) against Spaze Towers Private Limited. These applicants claimed to be financial creditors or unit allottees in the 'Spaze Arrow' project developed by Spaze Towers. They argued that Spaze Towers had defaulted on investment return schemes and breached collaboration agreements. The corporate debtor, Spaze Towers, opposed the intervention, asserting that these applicants lacked the locus standi to intervene at the pre-admission stage of a Section 7 application under the IBC. The corporate debtor relied on precedents stating that only the financial creditor and the
…Ishan Singh filed a petition under Section 7…
HRERA Gurugram site inspection report showed…