The case pertains to a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh Bench. The petitioner, Himmat Industries, is the Operational Creditor, and the respondent, Regnant Exim Pvt. Ltd, is the Corporate Debtor. The petition was presented through video conferencing.
Himmat Industries, the Operational Creditor, filed a petition against Regnant Exim Pvt. Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that, on instructions, the petitioner wished to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file it afresh. The court considered this statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file afresh.
Sign in to view the parties.
Himmat Industries filed a petition against…
Learned counsel for the petitioner requested to…
The case pertains to a petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) before the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Chandigarh Bench. The petitioner, Himmat Industries, is the Operational Creditor, and the respondent, Regnant Exim Pvt. Ltd, is the Corporate Debtor. The petition was presented through video conferencing.
Himmat Industries, the Operational Creditor, filed a petition against Regnant Exim Pvt. Ltd, the Corporate Debtor, under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016. During the proceedings, the learned counsel for the petitioner stated that, on instructions, the petitioner wished to withdraw the present petition with the liberty to file it afresh. The court considered this statement and dismissed the petition as withdrawn, granting the petitioner the liberty to file afresh.
Himmat Industries filed a petition against…
Learned counsel for the petitioner requested to…