The case involves an application IA(IBC) 201/2022 in relation to CP(IB) No.441/9/HDB/2020 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016. The Tribunal had previously ordered Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor, Raasi Refractories Ltd. However, the operational creditor, Global Monarch FZC, subsequently settled the dispute with the corporate debtor, and Form A was filed by the Resolution Professional.
Global Monarch FZC, an operational creditor, initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Raasi Refractories Ltd, the corporate debtor. The Tribunal ordered CIRP against the corporate debtor. Subsequently, Global Monarch FZC and Raasi Refractories Ltd settled their dispute. Form A, indicating the settlement, was filed by the Resolution Professional. The present application, IA(IBC) 201/2022, sought the withdrawal of the CIRP based on the settlement. The key fact is the settlement between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor after the CIRP had been initiated, leading to the application for withdrawal.
Sign in to view the parties.
CP(IB) No.441/9/HDB/2020…
Hearing held on…
The case involves an application IA(IBC) 201/2022 in relation to CP(IB) No.441/9/HDB/2020 under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016. The Tribunal had previously ordered Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against the corporate debtor, Raasi Refractories Ltd. However, the operational creditor, Global Monarch FZC, subsequently settled the dispute with the corporate debtor, and Form A was filed by the Resolution Professional.
Global Monarch FZC, an operational creditor, initiated Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP) against Raasi Refractories Ltd, the corporate debtor. The Tribunal ordered CIRP against the corporate debtor. Subsequently, Global Monarch FZC and Raasi Refractories Ltd settled their dispute. Form A, indicating the settlement, was filed by the Resolution Professional. The present application, IA(IBC) 201/2022, sought the withdrawal of the CIRP based on the settlement. The key fact is the settlement between the operational creditor and the corporate debtor after the CIRP had been initiated, leading to the application for withdrawal.
CP(IB) No.441/9/HDB/2020…
Hearing held on…