The case pertains to CP(IB) No.199/95/HDB/2022 filed under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016. The petitioner, Pridhvi Assets Reconstruction And Securitisation Company Ltd, initiated proceedings against the respondents, Smt. Kadiyala Suneetha & Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Pvt Ltd. The hearing was held on 21-06-2022 via video conference.
Pridhvi Assets Reconstruction And Securitisation Company Ltd filed a case (CP(IB) No.199/95/HDB/2022) against Smt. Kadiyala Suneetha & Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Pvt Ltd under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016. The court found a prima facie case established by the Financial Creditor. Shri Govada Venkata Subba Rao was proposed as the Resolution Professional and subsequently appointed by the court. An interim moratorium was imposed, preventing legal actions against the debtor. The Financial Creditor's counsel was directed to serve the order and application to the Resolution Professional. The case was adjourned for further consideration on 07.07.2022. The key fact is the appointment of the Resolution Professional and the imposition of the interim moratorium, which are
…Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on…
Matter listed for…
The case pertains to CP(IB) No.199/95/HDB/2022 filed under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016. The petitioner, Pridhvi Assets Reconstruction And Securitisation Company Ltd, initiated proceedings against the respondents, Smt. Kadiyala Suneetha & Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Pvt Ltd. The hearing was held on 21-06-2022 via video conference.
Pridhvi Assets Reconstruction And Securitisation Company Ltd filed a case (CP(IB) No.199/95/HDB/2022) against Smt. Kadiyala Suneetha & Sri Pavana Keerthi Hotels India Pvt Ltd under Section 95 of the IBC, 2016. The court found a prima facie case established by the Financial Creditor. Shri Govada Venkata Subba Rao was proposed as the Resolution Professional and subsequently appointed by the court. An interim moratorium was imposed, preventing legal actions against the debtor. The Financial Creditor's counsel was directed to serve the order and application to the Resolution Professional. The case was adjourned for further consideration on 07.07.2022. The key fact is the appointment of the Resolution Professional and the imposition of the interim moratorium, which are
…Hearing held on…
Matter listed for…