The case involves a petition filed under Section 95 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by a Financial Creditor. The court heard submissions from the Learned Counsel for the Financial Creditor and perused the application.
Power Finance Corporation filed a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against Sreenivas Motupalli, who is the respondent in this case. The petition was filed by the Financial Creditor. The court admitted the petition and declared an interim moratorium. Ms. T.K.Sharada was appointed as the Resolution Professional (RP). The RP is required to file a report under Section 99 of the IBC within 10 days from the date of her appointment. The petitioner is directed to intimate a copy of the order along with the application to the RP and file proof of the same in the Registry. The petitioner is also directed to issue notice to the Respondent and file proof of the same by way of an Affidavit. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 50,000 to
…Sign in to view the parties.
Hearing held on…
Order issu…
The case involves a petition filed under Section 95 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) by a Financial Creditor. The court heard submissions from the Learned Counsel for the Financial Creditor and perused the application.
Power Finance Corporation filed a petition under Section 95 of the Insolvency & Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) against Sreenivas Motupalli, who is the respondent in this case. The petition was filed by the Financial Creditor. The court admitted the petition and declared an interim moratorium. Ms. T.K.Sharada was appointed as the Resolution Professional (RP). The RP is required to file a report under Section 99 of the IBC within 10 days from the date of her appointment. The petitioner is directed to intimate a copy of the order along with the application to the RP and file proof of the same in the Registry. The petitioner is also directed to issue notice to the Respondent and file proof of the same by way of an Affidavit. The petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 50,000 to
…Hearing held on…
Order issu…