Value Ideas Investment Services Private Limited filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Oneview Corporate Advisors Private Limited, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Operational Creditor claimed that the Corporate Debtor failed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,17,36,575/- for consulting services rendered. The Corporate Debtor contested the petition, arguing that it is a financial service provider and the debt was disputed.
Value Ideas Investment Services Private Limited, the Operational Creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Oneview Corporate Advisors Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, for failing to pay Rs. 1,17,36,575/-. The Operational Creditor claimed the amount was due for consulting services provided since mid-2015, with an agreement for the Corporate Debtor to pay 35% of total fees received from customers after third-party expenses related to IPOs. The Corporate Debtor allegedly started delaying payments from March 2018. A demand notice under Section 8 of the Code was issued on May 29, 2021, and received by the Corporate Debtor on June 5, 2021. The Corporate Debtor replied on June 9, 2021, and stated in its
…Sign in to view the parties.
Oneview Corporate…
The Corporate Debtor…
Value Ideas Investment Services Private Limited filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Oneview Corporate Advisors Private Limited, seeking to initiate Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). The Operational Creditor claimed that the Corporate Debtor failed to pay a sum of Rs. 1,17,36,575/- for consulting services rendered. The Corporate Debtor contested the petition, arguing that it is a financial service provider and the debt was disputed.
Value Ideas Investment Services Private Limited, the Operational Creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against Oneview Corporate Advisors Private Limited, the Corporate Debtor, for failing to pay Rs. 1,17,36,575/-. The Operational Creditor claimed the amount was due for consulting services provided since mid-2015, with an agreement for the Corporate Debtor to pay 35% of total fees received from customers after third-party expenses related to IPOs. The Corporate Debtor allegedly started delaying payments from March 2018. A demand notice under Section 8 of the Code was issued on May 29, 2021, and received by the Corporate Debtor on June 5, 2021. The Corporate Debtor replied on June 9, 2021, and stated in its
…Oneview Corporate…
The Corporate Debtor…