The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The applicant, Chitra Publicity Company (OOH) Gujarat, filed an application against the respondent, Oasis Tradelink Limited. The matter was listed as Item No. 202 – IA 320 of 2020 and Item No. 203 – IA/1112(AHM)2023 in CP(IB) 433 of 2018. The applicant's counsel has repeatedly sought adjournment, and on multiple occasions, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Chitra Publicity Company (OOH) Gujarat filed an application against Oasis Tradelink Limited under Section 9 of the IBC. The case was listed as Item No. 202 – IA 320 of 2020 and Item No. 203 – IA/1112(AHM)2023 in CP(IB) 433 of 2018. On 12.09.2023, no one appeared for the applicant. On a previous hearing date, Mr. Shaan Munshaw appeared as proxy counsel for Ms. Pithu Parimal, representing the applicant, and sought an adjournment. On the present date, proxy counsel again appeared for the applicant and sought adjournment. The respondent's counsel stated that the applicant had not complied with the order dated 08.05.2023. The court noted the applicant's lack of action and perceived disinterest in pursuing the matter.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order dated 08.05.2023…
Nobody appea…
The case involves an application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC). The applicant, Chitra Publicity Company (OOH) Gujarat, filed an application against the respondent, Oasis Tradelink Limited. The matter was listed as Item No. 202 – IA 320 of 2020 and Item No. 203 – IA/1112(AHM)2023 in CP(IB) 433 of 2018. The applicant's counsel has repeatedly sought adjournment, and on multiple occasions, no one appeared on behalf of the applicant.
Chitra Publicity Company (OOH) Gujarat filed an application against Oasis Tradelink Limited under Section 9 of the IBC. The case was listed as Item No. 202 – IA 320 of 2020 and Item No. 203 – IA/1112(AHM)2023 in CP(IB) 433 of 2018. On 12.09.2023, no one appeared for the applicant. On a previous hearing date, Mr. Shaan Munshaw appeared as proxy counsel for Ms. Pithu Parimal, representing the applicant, and sought an adjournment. On the present date, proxy counsel again appeared for the applicant and sought adjournment. The respondent's counsel stated that the applicant had not complied with the order dated 08.05.2023. The court noted the applicant's lack of action and perceived disinterest in pursuing the matter.
Order dated 08.05.2023…
Nobody appea…