The case involves a company petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by Sunil Kumar, an operational creditor, against Nesa India Producer Company Limited. The petition was admitted on 25.11.2019, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Sudhanshu Gupta was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IRP performed duties such as public announcement, intimation to the corporate debtor, and visiting the registered office. However, the IRP faced challenges in obtaining necessary documents and cooperation from the directors of the suspended board. The IRP also observed suspicious cash transactions and discrepancies in the financial statements of the corporate debtor. Despite attempts to communicate with
…Sunil Kumar, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Nesa India Producer Company Limited. The petition was admitted on 25.11.2019, initiating CIRP, and Sudhanshu Gupta was appointed as IRP. The IRP performed duties like public announcement and intimation to the corporate debtor. The IRP faced difficulties in obtaining documents and cooperation from the directors of the suspended board, including Mr. Ashaq Aslam and Mr. Hitesh. The IRP observed suspicious cash transactions and discrepancies in the financial statements. The corporate debtor did not have any current or non-current liabilities. The IRP attempted to communicate with the directors and the operational creditor but received no claims. The last date for submission of claims
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Tribunal admitted the petition filed by…
The IRP made a public announcement in Form A of…
The case involves a company petition filed under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) by Sunil Kumar, an operational creditor, against Nesa India Producer Company Limited. The petition was admitted on 25.11.2019, initiating the Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP). Sudhanshu Gupta was appointed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). The IRP performed duties such as public announcement, intimation to the corporate debtor, and visiting the registered office. However, the IRP faced challenges in obtaining necessary documents and cooperation from the directors of the suspended board. The IRP also observed suspicious cash transactions and discrepancies in the financial statements of the corporate debtor. Despite attempts to communicate with
…Sunil Kumar, an operational creditor, filed a petition under Section 9 of the IBC against Nesa India Producer Company Limited. The petition was admitted on 25.11.2019, initiating CIRP, and Sudhanshu Gupta was appointed as IRP. The IRP performed duties like public announcement and intimation to the corporate debtor. The IRP faced difficulties in obtaining documents and cooperation from the directors of the suspended board, including Mr. Ashaq Aslam and Mr. Hitesh. The IRP observed suspicious cash transactions and discrepancies in the financial statements. The corporate debtor did not have any current or non-current liabilities. The IRP attempted to communicate with the directors and the operational creditor but received no claims. The last date for submission of claims
…The Tribunal admitted the petition filed by…
The IRP made a public announcement in Form A of…