The case involves an application to correct the name of the Resolution Professional in an order dated 2022-06-10. Initially, Mr. Anil Tayal was proposed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), but later, the applicant sought a change to Mr. Anurag Nirbhaya. The Adjudicating Authority approved the change, but the order incorrectly reflected Mr. Anil Tayal's name.
M/s. Remotebullion and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The Adjudicating Authority initially approved Mr. Anil Tayal as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Subsequently, the applicant requested a change of IRP to Mr. Anurag Nirbhaya, which was also approved. However, the order dated 2022-06-10 incorrectly reflected Mr. Anil Tayal's name. An application (IA/2911/2022) was filed to correct this error. The tribunal reviewed the application and the previous order and found the change of name to be legally valid. The key fact is the discrepancy in the order regarding the IRP's name and the subsequent application to rectify it.
Sign in to view the parties.
Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority in…
The tribunal delivered the order correcting…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.
The case involves an application to correct the name of the Resolution Professional in an order dated 2022-06-10. Initially, Mr. Anil Tayal was proposed as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP), but later, the applicant sought a change to Mr. Anurag Nirbhaya. The Adjudicating Authority approved the change, but the order incorrectly reflected Mr. Anil Tayal's name.
M/s. Remotebullion and Jewels Pvt. Ltd. filed a petition under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC), 2016. The Adjudicating Authority initially approved Mr. Anil Tayal as the Interim Resolution Professional (IRP). Subsequently, the applicant requested a change of IRP to Mr. Anurag Nirbhaya, which was also approved. However, the order dated 2022-06-10 incorrectly reflected Mr. Anil Tayal's name. An application (IA/2911/2022) was filed to correct this error. The tribunal reviewed the application and the previous order and found the change of name to be legally valid. The key fact is the discrepancy in the order regarding the IRP's name and the subsequent application to rectify it.
Order passed by the Adjudicating Authority in…
The tribunal delivered the order correcting…
Sign in to view related legal provisions.