Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), an Operational Creditor, filed an application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking permission from the NCLT to continue arbitration proceedings against McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The Financial Creditor had previously filed an application under Section 7 of the IBC against the Corporate Debtor, which was admitted on 29.04.2022. The arbitration proceedings commenced due to disputes arising from an arbitration agreement dated 22.09.2012. SAIL terminated the contract on 20.05.2016 due to the Corporate Debtor's failure to mobilize resources and adhere to specified timelines.
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), acting as an Operational Creditor, initiated arbitration proceedings against McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited (MBECL), the Corporate Debtor, due to disputes arising from a contract dated 22.09.2012. SAIL terminated the contract on 20.05.2016 because MBECL failed to mobilize resources and adhere to the contract's timelines. Subsequently, a Financial Creditor filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against MBECL, which was admitted on 29.04.2022, triggering a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. SAIL then filed an application under Section 60(5) of the IBC seeking permission to continue the arbitration proceedings despite the moratorium. SAIL argued that its claim should be
…Sign in to view the parties.
Arbitration agreement…
The Applicant terminated the contract with the…
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), an Operational Creditor, filed an application under Section 60(5) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, seeking permission from the NCLT to continue arbitration proceedings against McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited, the Corporate Debtor. The Financial Creditor had previously filed an application under Section 7 of the IBC against the Corporate Debtor, which was admitted on 29.04.2022. The arbitration proceedings commenced due to disputes arising from an arbitration agreement dated 22.09.2012. SAIL terminated the contract on 20.05.2016 due to the Corporate Debtor's failure to mobilize resources and adhere to specified timelines.
Steel Authority of India Limited (SAIL), acting as an Operational Creditor, initiated arbitration proceedings against McNally Bharat Engineering Company Limited (MBECL), the Corporate Debtor, due to disputes arising from a contract dated 22.09.2012. SAIL terminated the contract on 20.05.2016 because MBECL failed to mobilize resources and adhere to the contract's timelines. Subsequently, a Financial Creditor filed an application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) against MBECL, which was admitted on 29.04.2022, triggering a moratorium under Section 14 of the IBC. SAIL then filed an application under Section 60(5) of the IBC seeking permission to continue the arbitration proceedings despite the moratorium. SAIL argued that its claim should be
…Arbitration agreement…
The Applicant terminated the contract with the…