The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor, Maruti Inox India Pvt Ltd, for initiating CIRP. The Corporate Debtor stated that its registered address is in Mumbai, which was reflected in the Master Data provided by the Operational Creditor. The application was previously disposed of on the ground that the Ahmedabad Bench did not have jurisdiction, vide order dated 07.12.2021.
The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, against Maruti Inox India Pvt Ltd. The Corporate Debtor claimed its registered address was in Mumbai, as reflected in the Master Data. The application was initially dismissed due to jurisdictional issues. The Operational Creditor now claims to have found an address in Mehsana and alleges the Master Data address is false, accusing the Corporate Debtor of forgery. The Operational Creditor seeks action against the Corporate Debtor and revival of the previously dismissed application. The application does not contain any documentary proof to show that the address of the Corporate Debtor is at Mehsana as mentioned by the Applicant. On the contrary, even today, the Master Date is shared by Learned
…Sign in to view the parties.
The Adjudicating Authority was informed that the…
Order delivere…
The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016 against the Corporate Debtor, Maruti Inox India Pvt Ltd, for initiating CIRP. The Corporate Debtor stated that its registered address is in Mumbai, which was reflected in the Master Data provided by the Operational Creditor. The application was previously disposed of on the ground that the Ahmedabad Bench did not have jurisdiction, vide order dated 07.12.2021.
The Operational Creditor filed an application under Section 9 of the IBC, 2016, against Maruti Inox India Pvt Ltd. The Corporate Debtor claimed its registered address was in Mumbai, as reflected in the Master Data. The application was initially dismissed due to jurisdictional issues. The Operational Creditor now claims to have found an address in Mehsana and alleges the Master Data address is false, accusing the Corporate Debtor of forgery. The Operational Creditor seeks action against the Corporate Debtor and revival of the previously dismissed application. The application does not contain any documentary proof to show that the address of the Corporate Debtor is at Mehsana as mentioned by the Applicant. On the contrary, even today, the Master Date is shared by Learned
…The Adjudicating Authority was informed that the…
Order delivere…